Firing Blanks at the Chamber

WashPost: Obama Continues Attack on Chamber of Commerce

The White House intensified its attacks Sunday on the powerful U.S. Chamber of Commerce for its alleged ties to foreign donors, part of an escalating Democratic effort to link Republican allies with corporate and overseas interests ahead of the November midterm elections.

The chamber adamantly denies that foreign funds are used in its U.S. election efforts, accusing Democrats of orchestrating a speculative smear campaign during a desperate political year.

President Obama, speaking at a rally in Philadelphia, said “the American people deserve to know who is trying to sway their elections” and raised the possibility that foreigners could be funding his opponents.

“You don’t know,” Obama said at the rally for Senate candidate Joe Sestak and other Democrats. “It could be the oil industry. It could even be foreign-owned corporations. You don’t know because they don’t have to disclose.”

The remarks are part of a volley of recent attacks by Obama and other Democrats on alleged foreign influence within the Republican caucus, whether through support for outsourcing jobs by major U.S. corporations or through overseas money making its way into the coffers of GOP-leaning interest groups.

The Democratic National Committee began airing ads over the weekend attacking the chamber as “shills for big business” and claiming: “It appears they’ve even taken foreign money to spend on our elections.” The ad also attacks Karl Rove, former Bush administration political adviser, and Ed Gillespie, former Republican National Committee chief, for their ties to American Crossroads, an independent group also spending big on election ads this year.

“Tell the Bush crowd and the Chamber of Commerce: Stop stealing our democracy,” the ad says.

It may be a little petty and pedestrian of me, but I find it amazing that the same group of people who offered unequivocal support to voter fraud and voter intimidation specialists like ACORN and the New Black Panthers have the temerity to accuse Republicans of trying to “sway” elections through trumped-up foreign connections. Plus, as Michelle Malkin pointed out, whenever Republicans question Democrats’ propensity for finding plenty of foreign cash for elections, the Democrats dutifully let loose with cries of racism and nativism.

Furthermore, I find it interesting that they lambaste the GOP for its “support for outsourcing jobs by major U.S. corporations” when, looked at on a systemic level, it is the policies of the American left in Washington which drives jobs and business and growth and prosperity overseas in the first place.

As far as the president’s argument goes substantively, Malkin does a nice job breaking down the fact that even the most Obama-friendly media outlets have said that the White House’s argument against the Chamber is much ado about nothing.  The New York Times, Malkin pointed out, held last week that “there is little evidence that what the chamber does in collecting overseas dues is improper or even unusual, according to both liberal and conservative election-law lawyers and campaign finance documents,” and CBS News’ Bob Schieffer characterized the argument as “peanuts.”

Nevertheless, we’re less than a month away from the mid-term elections, and Barack Obama was speaking in Philadelphia, where business growth and job growth and overall prosperity has recently become taboo — so what did you expect?

Share

Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    “the American people deserve to know who is trying to sway their elections”
    -Obama

    YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME, GET THE FRICKING LOG OUT OF YOUR OWN EYE, Barry.

  2. Tory says:

    The Dems’ and 0′s desperation is making them do literally crazy things; instead of wiping their brows in relief over having dodged the likely-illicit ’08 campaign contributions and contemplating the value of remaining mum, they are recklessly looking to implicate themselves. I don’t think the media is as reliably fawning as during the ’08 campaign, and the public is increasingly annoyed with 0 and liberal wing of Congress. All in all, though, I hope he keeps making unscripted comments…every time he plays the blame game, more people move to the Republican side. (As an added bonus, this report comes from a Democratic site,lol)

    http://www.democracycorps.com/strategy/2010/09/an-alert-changing-the-framework-and-outcome-in-2010/?section=Analysis

  3. Gail B. says:

    Obama thinks that, just because he speaks, he will get his way. I’m waiting for a “bigger and better” one to step up to the plate and put him in his place. Oh! That be We the People, on November 2, when we take out his “aides and abettors,” i.e. TRASH!

  4. John Buyon says:

    There is a reason why there exists a double standard for republicans and democrats regarding shady dealings.

    the shenanigans of the republicans/conservatives are much more dangerous because
    1) conservatives represent the interests of the big wealthy & powerful contrasted with democrats who support the interests of poorer middle class and working class.

    2) everyone ( including me) expects the democrats to be more corrupt, aren’t the republicans supposed to be the adults? the responsible father who comes and protects the nation and spends responsibly.

    This is why corruption in the right wing should be treated with a lot more suspicion than in the left wing.

Speak Your Mind

*