Morality and Libertarianism

The New Criterion: Morals & the servile mind

This piece starts with some excellent political observations:

Our rulers are theoretically “our” representatives, but they are busy turning us into the instruments of the projects they keep dreaming up. The business of governments, one might think, is to supply the framework of law within which we may pursue happiness on our own account. Instead, we are constantly being summoned to reform ourselves. Debt, intemperance, and incompetence in rearing our children are no doubt regrettable, but they are vices, and left alone, they will soon lead to the pain that corrects. Life is a better teacher of virtue than politicians, and most sensible governments in the past left moral faults to the churches. But democratic citizenship in the twenty-first century means receiving a stream of improving “messages” from politicians. Some may forgive these intrusions because they are so well intentioned. Who would defend prejudice, debt, or excessive drinking? The point, however, is that our rulers have no business telling us how to live. They are tiresome enough in their exercise of authority—they are intolerable when they mount the pulpit. Nor should we be in any doubt that nationalizing the moral life is the first step towards totalitarianism.

It really shines, however, when the author ties this in to personal morality:

The philosopher Socrates argued that the most important activity of a human being was reflecting on how one ought to live. Most people are not philosophers, but they cannot avoid encountering moral issues. The evident problem with democracy today is that the state is pre-empting—or “crowding out,” as the economists say—our moral judgments.

He is right. Responsibility and freedom are two sides to the same coin. As the nanny-state grows like a monstrous, national tumor to relieve us of our responsibilities to care for ourselves and for each other there’s a corresponding reduction in our freedom. Not only are our civil liberties dwindling, but our capacity to act as moral agents is also atrophying.



  1. Communists make lousy parents says:

    From a guy with no daddy……

    I have to go throw up now.

  2. Robert Wallace says:

    In terms of the government taking over more and more of our moral sphere I’m as annoyed by this site as anyone, but I don’t think Obama having an absent father disqualifies him from understanding the importance of fathers.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Good daddies buy CFl bulbs and make sure the TV is unplugged when done.

  4. .gov coming soon for you says:

Speak Your Mind