It’s Lights Out for the Economy, as Three Senators Introduce New Energy Bill

Oh, for crying out loud, Lindsey Graham is simply going to drive me insane.  I’ve met him before on a few occasions and he truly is a nice and gracious man, but in terms of politics somebody in the Republican Party really, really needs to put a leash on him.

Not only is Graham crossing the aisle and joining forces with New York Sen. Chuck Schumer in drafting a new comprehensive immigration bill through which 15 to 20 million illegal immigrants will be given amnesty, the Financial Times is now reporting that he and two other senators, John Kerry of Massachusetts and Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, have come together and sponsored a brand spanking new energy bill which will place carbon emissions caps on utilities by 2012 and on manufacturers by 2016.

That’s right, on the two major issues which will be tackled by the Democratic Party leadership before they lose the majority in November, Graham is single-handedly facilitating the “bipartisan” label on both.

Seriously.  A leash.

Now, that’s not to say that there isn’t some good stuff in the bill, some meat and potatoes which will both get Republicans on board in a political sense and actually be good for the country as a whole.  There most certainly is.  According to the Financial Times, the bill would in theory expand offshore oil drilling and nuclear power generation, both essential components in achieving true energy independence.

The problem I have with the legislation, at least from what I can gather from the smattering of information provided by the Financial Times, is that it will kill whatever business development and job growth the Democrats’ health care reform has left behind, and that it does not account for one very important and very real variable — the worthless word of this administration.

According to the Financial Times piece, the bill has been encouraged by President Barack Obama himself.  This is the same president who just ordered a three-year moratorium on offshore drilling.  And this is a president who has no problem making promises he never intends to keep in order to secure votes for bills he deems important.  If the Republicans get in bed with Obama and the Democrats on this legislation, baited into it by empty promises on offshore drilling, they will come up with nothing to show for it but a carbon taxing mechanism which will destroy whatever is left of American industry.

And, above all else, the environmental concerns upon which all of this is laid are all based on lies.  The planet has been cooling for the past decade, not warming.  Air quality is exponentially better now than in 1990, not worse. Fish populations are burgeoning thanks to the artificial reefs created by offshore oil platforms, not dying.  And new research shows that the polar bear population is actually thriving, having nearly tripled since the mid-1980s, and the species is nowhere near the level of trouble as the environmental left would lead us to believe.

Also, of course, there were the leaked emails from the East Anglia Climate Research Unit which showed that much of the data upon which the hypothesis that the human race is responsible for global warming was purposefully manipulated to fit a political agenda. Point being, just like health care reform will cause health care costs to rise at a rate higher than costs were rising under the much-maligned former status quo, the energy policy being floated by Graham and his friends could also end up doing more harm than good.

Placing yet another burden on American business, adding the uncertainty of added energy costs on top of added health care costs, will most certainly drive more industry overseas to places like India and China, where pollution controls are virtually non-existent.  And, like the smoking section in a completely open restaurant, we all have to breathe the same air.

Graham’s biggest argument, it seems, is that he can distinguish between last year’s failed cap-and-trade bill and this piece of legislation because this one implements a carbon tax on a sector-by-sector basis, affecting utilities first, and then manufacturing.  I don’t understand how it matters.  It’s uncertainty which has killed job growth in this country, and when business owners large and small look at this new energy bill, the only thing they can be certain of is that, sector-by-sector or not, eventually a carbon tax will be affecting us all.

At the heart of it all, though, I think I speak for a lot of Americans when I say that I’ve just grown tired of the idea that the government is the ultimate arbiter of everyday life in America.  And right now, in the midst of a faux economic recovery, with unemployment numbers which still hover at about 10 percent, and with the added burden already placed upon employers already by ObamaCare, this is not the time for new taxes, whether they be added burdens placed on utilities and manufacturers which will be passed down to consumers, or whether they be in the form of a gasoline tax which consumers themselves will see at the pump.

Now is not the time.  Now is NOT the time.  And while part of me believes that the Democrats are dredging up what they call a watered-down version of cap-and-trade only in order to tire their Republican counterparts in advance of immigration reform, another part of me thinks that this White House and this Congress have been emboldened by the passage of health care reform and understand that everybody on Capitol Hill has a price.

Lindsey Graham, however, sure seems like he’s working pro bono.

Share

Comments

  1. John Feeny says:

    Jeff – Here’s what I think is an important suggestion – I think we need to send this link to his office, and I’ll be glad to be the one to do it. This man is selling out whatever’s left of the Republican party in order to secure his re-election and preferential government treatment for the rest of his life.

    To Mr. Graham – if, indeed, you ever set eyes upon this – you and any other Republicans who plan to cross the aisle on this nightmare legislation either can’t see the car wreck that is staring you in the face, or you’re a self-styled elitist who doesn’t give a damn about the futures of the children of millions of honest Americans. Don’t think for a minute that your constituents and all Americans won’t remember this betrayal, Mr. Graham; you’re going to place yourself on the same Benedict Arnold list that many politicians already have willingly done.

    Enjoy your laurels, Mr. Graham….I’m not sure I could.

  2. IGNORANCE RULES says:

    I give up. Our leadership is S T U P I D.

  3. Gail B. says:

    Jeff, I don’t know if you found this yourself or got the heads-up from my email, but I KNEW what your reaction would be when you read it!

    Graham is a piece of work, a RINO, and really should be targeted by his constituents, his county and state Republican Party, and by any passersby for a real tongue lashing during the two weeks he will be home!

    I didn’t like him when I was voting the Democratic ticket, and I damn sure don’t like him now!

  4. Jeff Schreiber says:

    John, I’m going to TRY to talk to him. I’d love to give him a good interview. He is spot on about healthcare, but I’d love to quiz him on some of this stuff.

    Don’t send anything to his office yet. While it’s been ten years and the guy probably doesn’t remember me from the Seneca Daily Journal, it’s worth a try.

    In the meantime, as I’m still trying to work something out with Joe Barton–my own schedule has actually forced me to say no twice to a very nice and very helpful staffer–this will definitely give me a little more to talk about.

    Jeff

  5. Gail B. says:

    And, another thing: Last night (or this morning) when I went to sleep, I was thinking about the horrible burden this healthcare bill is going to cost our children.

    Daniel Hannan, MEP, said it well in Ian Thorpe’s article last September. Put “Daniel Hannan” in the search box to the right of “Jeff’s Corner,” and it will come right up for you. He mentioned that the cost of the interest for the debt to our children will be more than it will take to educate them. That really bothers me.

  6. Gail B. says:

    Excuse me. Senator Graham, I don’t know you, have never met you, so I don’t know if I like you or not. I do NOT like your political leanings to the left, however. You are bordering on being another Arlen Specter. (And that’s about as bad as it gets!)

  7. Boston Blackie says:

    Jeff-
    Good luck, I hope you score an interview with him. I agree he was spot on regarding healthcare but I just don’t get it with him sometimes. I am tried on the repubs trying to reach across the aisle so we can all get along just to have their hands bit off at the wrist.
    Gail-
    Girlfriend, you shocked me with your acknowledgement of voting democRAT in the past. I guess you have to have been in the dark to see the light!

  8. WND reported today the Graham suddenly dropped his support of the amnesty bill. Perhaps the flood of calls to his office by his constituents had an impact, with people pressuring him to take his head out of *ss?

    Maybe they need to do the same for this.

    Hey Graham – cut the crap. you want to get re-elected? Return to conservative principles and stop sponsoring and supporting bills that will harm America now and in the future.

  9. Brian says:

    “Discretionary spending would be $0.6 trillion above CBO’s baseline projection; nondefense programs would receive more than 70 percent of that increase.”
    “The Administration did not provide detailed information about its request for discretionary funding for 2010 to 2019, so CBO estimated the President’s proposals by using the aggregate totals provided in the budget.”

    Page 17 of “A Preliminary Analysis of the President’s Budget and an Update of CBO’s Budget and Economic Outlook”

    Here’s 5% of GDP in discretionary spending. Small wonder that no one can point to an exact piece of legislation

    http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=10014

  10. Brian says:

    I discovered the above line amid some research and debate.

    Commonly cited is a CBPP analysis ( http://www.cbpp.org/files/12-16-09bud.pdf )
    This report labels the same $0.6 Trillion spending, as “Bush-Era Tax Cuts”, even though they have expired and do not afect annual revenue in 2019. And people believe it. I have challenged a number of friends to explain the 10 year deficit to me, and many have returned to me citing this report. It needs to be exposed.

  11. Jordan Bell says:

    To add some more to this, there is an article on Foxnews now saying that NASA climate data is worse than Climate-Gate.

    http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/03/30/nasa-data-worse-than-climategate-data/

  12. Starve the beast says:

    If only we could starve this government of revenue, as they are starving us of energy.

  13. Climate issues…..YAWN. I completely forgot about “Earth Day/Earth Hour” (or whatever the hell these hippies call it) Sat evening. I wanted to show my disdain by leaving on all my lights. Last year I blew a fuse.

    I’m so tired of RINOs. It’s time to get rid of all of them.

  14. Jeff Schreiber says:

    “Last year I blew a fuse.”

    Phenomenal.

  15. Fight silly with frilly says:

    I’m putting ALL my Christmas lights back out.

  16. GE says:

    Jeff,

    you should ask for photo submissions from us showing OUR Earth Hour observations.

    Tipper

Speak Your Mind

*