Oh, Bartender!

Assigned Reading: Prof Busted in Columbia ‘Gal’ Punch
(FROM: The New York Post)

A prominent Columbia architecture professor punched a female university employee in the face at a Harlem bar during a heated argument about race relations, cops said yesterday.

Police busted Lionel McIntyre, 59, for assault yesterday after his bruised victim, Camille Davis, filed charges.

McIntyre and Davis, who works as a production manager in the school’s theater department, are both regulars at Toast, a popular university bar on Broadway and 125th Street, sources said.

The professor, who is black, had been engaged in a fiery discussion about “white privilege” with Davis, who is white, and another male regular, who is also white, Friday night at 10:30 when fists started flying, patrons said.

McIntyre, who is known as “Mac” at the bar, shoved Davis, and when the other patron and a bar employee tried to break it up, the prof slugged Davis in the face, witnesses said.

“The punch was so loud, the kitchen workers in the back heard it over all the noise,” bar back Richie Velez, 28, told The Post. “I was on my way over when he punched Camille and she fell on top of me.”

While I don’t want to jump to conclusions here, clearly the white woman was acting stupidly–as white people in the northeast seem to do, according to the White House–and simply had it coming. Clearly, by even questioning a black Ivy League university professor, she was obviously a racist.

Oh, boy — President Obama is gonna need another case of beer.

All kidding aside, this is absolutely insane. First of all, it’s never acceptable to hit a woman. Granted, if she has a bomb strapped to her abdomen and climbs aboard a bus shouting “Allahu Akbar,” perhaps two to the chest and one to the head would be appropriate. However, in a bar called “Toast,” or any other bar, restaurant, home, building or non-Jihad-related situation, it is never, ever acceptable to hit a woman. Never. Secondly, because he is black and she is white and the melee ensued during a discussion of race relations, shouldn’t this be considered a “hate crime,” or do hate crimes only count when the aggressor is white, straight and Christian?

Share

Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    Jeff,

    Just hang on, the Justice Brothers Jessie & Al will be along to stand against this obvious racial based attack on this woman !!!

    Er —— NOT !!!

  2. Vibe says:

    When I was growing up the conventional wisdom was that it's never appropriate to strike a "Lady". Females behaving in a clearly unladylike fashion were exempt from this protection – If one assaults you with a weapon she's fair game by right of self preservation. But simply to "win" an argument? Hardly appropriate. One has to wonder if this mans affirmative action status was being called into question. Putting "White Privilege" up against the "Affirmative action" runaround – White privilege" still comes up a bit short. But that, of course, is "just" one mans opinion.

  3. Ian Thorpe says:

    I think it's time we started that conversation with Mr. Holder on race relations Jeff.

  4. Laurie says:

    Jeff…I do believe your final sentence says it all. Sad, but oh so true!!

  5. Anonymous says:
  6. Rix says:

    One word: TNB, multiplied by Ivy arrogance. One shouldn't expect any better. The only reason Obama hasn't hit anyone yet is because he has Rahm Emmanuel's thugs for that.

  7. Claudia says:

    I hope to hell that she gets a GREAT LAWYER and that the court case totally creams this "man's" obviously "racist" drawers so far that he has to spend the rest of his stinking life paying her off from the compensatory charges-fees-monies that will be found against him, hitting any WOMAN in the face, though many might want to do it, is UNACCEPTABLE IN ANY RACE, AND situation, and for any reason.

    Men are far more able to do the reach and far more strength is available to them in that forearm, that could disfigure said woman who is smaller and a lot more open to such disfigurement than a man is, more because of the nature of the size difference between men and women. The guy looks to be at the very least an amature athlete who is in more than reasonable shape, and I bet his right packs a powerful amount of strength behind it, and to use that on a woman, is more than disgusting.

  8. Gail B says:

    "Let's not jump to conclusions!"

    We probably won't be hearing ANYTHING from the White House about this because clearly the fault lies with the person of inconvenient color. There is nothing that an Obama/Soetoro wordsmith can say to change the circumstances of the victim being white and a woman or to shift the blame from the black professor to the white female theater production manager.

    Good for her! She filed charges against him!

    Analyze that, Obama/Soetoro!

  9. Rix says:

    Ian Thorpe:
    > I think it's time we started that conversation with Mr. Holder
    > on race relations Jeff.

    Oh, the sacred naivete of the right. You may as well talk applied anatomy with Jack the Ripper.

  10. Boston Blackie says:

    Oh, it will be considered a hate crime – against the black "man"(I put it in quotes since he is such a real man hitting a woman). How dare northeast racist honkies from hymietown even make eye contact with such a distinguish professor, right Obamama!! I'm sure we'll see this on the lame stream media (cricket sound please).
    Off subject but scary, the DOJ requesting website vistors' personal info. Big brother Holder is watching.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/09/taking_liberties/entry5595506.shtml?tag=mncol;txt

  11. Boston Blackie says:

    Anon 10:31 – I knew something was up when I saw on Saturday that both "winners" in the special elections had been swore in and voted with Pelosi. Anyone with half a brain knows if the election was Tuesday then not all votes had been counted by the weekend. What is Hoffman's options now.

  12. SPEAKING OF QUOTAS, I'LL HAVE ANOTHER ONE says:

    Anybody that would rather punch, than keep checking out the ladies and pounding another brew down, is insane, and should not be a professor of anything.

  13. Boston Blackie says:

    Another off subject but proof we are an insane state in mASSachusetts
    http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1211442

    The accused terrorist in Boston had a bail hearing today and HUNDREDS came out to support his request for release on bail. Guess what, yes you are correct, the federal judge took it under advisement. WTF

  14. Boston Blackie says:

    Just thinking, how long before the womens groups are out protesting and demanding the firing of this "prominent Columbia architecture professor". Let's make sure we don't hold our breath while we wait.

  15. Anonymous says:

    While I completely agree that in MOST situations it is completely unacceptable to strike a woman, I will submit for your consideration three exceptions to the rule:

    1) When a woman attacks a man. This happens more often than many realize, though rarely reported, and men do have the right to defend themselves.

    2) When a woman attacks someone who cannot defend themselves. I do not mean disciplining a misbehaving child, I mean physical assault upon someone who is injured or otherwise disabled (happened recently near where I live–a woman knocked down a man with a walker and stole his wallet).

    3) When a woman is trying to harm herself.

    Now, let the stone throwing begin.

    Respectfully,

    cap'n chumbucket.

  16. Anonymous says:

    She should never have hit the purfessor in the fist with her face.

    He deserves a peace prize for peacefully ending this racially charged incident…..

    Oh, sorry, I accidentally channelled the MSM during my typing of this reply.

Speak Your Mind

*