Take My Fat, Please

Assigned Reading: Liposuction Leftovers Easily Converted to Stem Cells
(FROM: Next Big Future)

Big thanks to Instapundit for pointing out this link — I would not have seen it on my own. Here’s a quote from a study conducted by the Stanford School of Medicine:

Thirty to 40 percent of adults in this country are obese,” agreed cardiologist Joseph Wu, MD, PhD, the paper’s senior author. “Not only can we start with a lot of cells, we can reprogram them much more efficiently. Fibroblasts, or skin cells, must be grown in the lab for three weeks or more before they can be reprogrammed. But these stem cells from fat are ready to go right away.”

The fact that the cells can also be converted without the need for mouse-derived “feeder cells” may make them an ideal starting material for human therapies. Feeder cells are often used when growing human skin cells outside the body, but physicians
worry that cross-species contamination could make them unsuitable for human use.

Even those of us who are not obese would probably be happy to part with a couple of pounds (or more) of flab. Nestled within this unwanted latticework of fat cells and collagen are multipotent cells called adipose, or fat, stem cells. Unlike highly specialized skin-cell fibroblasts, these cells in the fat have a relatively wide portfolio of differentiation options—becoming fat, bone or muscle as needed. It’s this pre-existing flexibility, the researchers believe, that gives these cell an edge over the skin cells.

“These cells are not as far along on the differentiation pathway, so they’re easier to back up to an earlier state,” said first author and postdoctoral scholar Ning Sun, PhD, who conducted the research in both Longaker’s and Wu’s laboratories. “They are more embryonic-like than fibroblasts, which take more effort to reprogram.”

These reprogrammed iPS cells are usually created by expressing four genes, called Yamanaka factors, normally unexpressed (or expressed at very low levels) in adult cells.

Sun found that the fat stem cells actually express higher starting levels of two of the four reprogramming genes than do adult skin cells—suggesting that these cells are already primed for change. When he added all four genes, about 0.01 percent of the skin-cell fibroblasts eventually became iPS cells but about 0.2 percent of the fat stem cells did so—a 20-fold improvement in efficiency.

The new iPS cells passed the standard tests for pluripotency:

“Imagine if we could isolate fat cells from a patient with some type of congenital cardiac disease,” said Wu. “We could then differentiate them into cardiac cells, study how they respond to different drugs or stimuli and see how they compare to normal cells. This would be a great advance.”

“The field now needs to move forward in ways that the Food and Drug Administration would approve —with cells that can be efficiently reprogrammed without the risk of cross-species contamination—and Stanford is an ideal place for that to happen.”

I know what you’re thinking. This story is huge. Well, you’re right, except that the mainstream press will pay it little to no attention, much like the little to no attention paid to the story breaking over the past year that adult stem cells can be manipulated to behave like embryonic stem cells.

Nevertheless, I find it interesting, and would be thrilled if we could explore the potential of stem cell research without the destruction of life. And, regardless, if we are indeed destined and doomed to destroy life in order to perhaps have the chance of extending our own–I don’t get the selfishness–at least let such research be funded by something other than my tax money. I understand the need to foster progress, but we should exhaust our research on adult stem cells, umbilical stem cells, current lines of embryonic stem cells, and stem cells from my love handles before resorting to harvesting new ones. When in doubt, err on the side of life.

Should this fat-to-stem-cell techonology work out, though, I might feel a little less guilty about that next plate of nachos. “No, honey, I’m not concerned about my waistline — I’m curing cancer.”

Share

Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    Earlier this year I watched this video: Dr. Oz to Oprah and Michael J Fox: "The stem cell debate is dead."

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDFJOzu9SyM

    "Dr. Oz explains to Oprah and Michael J. Fox why embryonic stem cell research is dangerous and won't cure Parkinson's, but Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell research will!"

    I was excited by what Dr. Oz was saying, yet I can't remember seeing anything in the media about this. Perhaps I missed it. And now yet another breakthrough. I wonder if this will get any coverage.

    Larry

  2. Gail B says:

    Do not ask how my weight is the same as it was when I graduated from high school–140 pounds spread across a frame 5' 11'' tall.

    All that's nice, except that there's no fat for stem cells, should I need them! That is outstanding news for those who need lyposuction, however.

    Well, Jeff, I do know how my weight is maintained, too! My watchband is my guide. If it slides around my wrist, I eat more. When the expansion joints leave marks, I eat less.

    I am rewarded by Bermuda shorts and other articles of clothing that I've grown to love and will patch to keep from having to replace them because they fit so well. The black bikini and high-cut bathing suits have been replaced by a more modest one, however.

    Does anyone else HATE shopping for clothes?

  3. Rix says:

    I have never understood the strange fascination with the abortion right that the so-called "progressives" carry as a political banner. Being an immoral, non-Christian bastard, I see murder as a rather minor transgression and do not reject the idea of compulsory population control. But an abortion is not just a murder of an innocent – it is an UNNECESSARY murder that no one benefits from, and as such, it is clearly evil. This might be the only social issue on which I am at least borderline conservative. And as for population control, I'd rather start with cutting welfare!

  4. Starys says:

    I vaguely remember hearing about this somewhere, finding it interesting and wanting to search for more info on it then I forgot all about it.
    I really just wanted to reply to Gail… Yes, I HATE shopping for clothes too and I am 2 inches shorter than you but the same weight.
    If you want a shopping nightmare take my 17yo daughter to the mall. She's 5'10" and 115lbs. Have fun trying to find modest shorts for her and a pair of jeans that don't break the bank.
    Fortunately she goes to a joint vocational school and has to wear scrubs so she can get by with just a couple of pairs of jeans and a pair of dress pants for professional days.

  5. Gail B says:

    What's logical about this?
    – One of the czars thinks that it's okay for an animal to sue a person. An aborted baby cannot sue.

    For that matter, can anyone see any logic in anything that Obama/Soetoro is pushing? I mean, anything actually GOOD for this country?

  6. Ian Thorpe says:

    Well that stymies the idea of fatsally at Boggart Blog who suggested we might render overweight people to harvest the raw hydrocarbons that human body fat consists of.

    That means we revert to the idea of my good friend Sir Hector Gobbett Broadsides, MP for Rawtenborough since 1832. He has worked out that we can use unwanted children to meet our energy needs.

  7. Jan says:

    Great! Where do I sign up to donate?

  8. Gail B says:

    Jan–
    ROFLMAO! That was good! "Where do I sign up to donate [fat cells]?"

  9. Gail B says:

    Ian–Would that include the product from abortions?

Speak Your Mind

*