Pence Introduces Resolution Supporting Dissidents in Iran

Considering the nature of what’s going on in Iran in the aftermath of what could only have been a rigged election, the White House took far too long to address any of it, especially considering that the silence comes from the same president who, at the start of the Iranian election when all of the stories centered on amazing turnout and when it looked as though reformist candidate Mir-Hossein Mousavi could be poised for victory, practically took credit for it all, touting his Cairo speech as somehow the missing catalyst for “change” in Tehran and beyond.

I’m still learning about the situation, but from the angle of someone who still doesn’t know enough, it looks as though the protests and such in the aftermath of the election will end in one of two ways: either it will be 1979 all over again, when the Iranian Revolution overthrew the Shah, or it will be 1989 in Tiananmen Square — and we all know what happened then. Unfortunately, news today that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s government has thrown out foreign journalists certainly makes me think it could be the latter.

Considering that possibility and more, Indiana Congressman Mike Pence took to the floor of the House of Representatives today and introduced a resolution supporting the dissidents in Iran. Here is the text of that speech:

I come to this floor at an extraordinary moment on the global stage.

According to the Islamic Republic News Agency, the official news agency of Iran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad supposedly won the election over his primary opponent on 12 June, 2009. But from the very moment that that election result was announced, the international community and the international press called it into question. The basis for that, even before the extraordinary demonstrations had begun to take place, was the fact that these were paper ballots. But the official government results of the election were announced literally within hours of the polls being closed. Various media outlets around the world questioned the authenticity of the results.

Mr. Mousavi, the defeated candidate, has launched a legal appeal against the election results. On the day of the election, mobile phone communications were interrupted. Western media has reported, ‘heavy electronic jamming, disturbing broadcasts.’ News websites were reportedly blocked by Iranian authorities and the Iranian government has allegedly arrested opposition political figures and journalists. The Iranian government has outlawed any protest following two days of extraordinary unrest. The BBC recently reported that recent rallies in the streets of Tehran were the biggest demonstrations in the Islamic Republic’s 30-year history.

The protest, according to news reports, became violent and, according to media reports, pro-government forces attacked demonstrators in the last 24 hours, causing at least one fatality. We are witnessing a Tiananmen in Tehran, and the United States of America must stand in the gap on behalf of those brave Iranian citizens who are standing for free and fair elections, democracy and basic rights.

Freedom in fact may be flowering in Iran as hundreds of thousands rally for democracy and free elections. While I appreciate President Obama’s comments yesterday at the White House that he was, ‘troubled by the violence,’ and his belief that the voices of the Iranian people should, be ‘heard and respected,’ it seems by my lights that this administration has yet to express the unqualified support of the American people for those who are courageously taking to the streets for free elections and for democracy in Iran.

Let me say from my heart, the American cause is freedom and in this cause the American people will not be silent, here or abroad. If the President of the United States won’t express the unqualified support of our nation for the dissidents in the streets of Tehran, this Congress must.

Today I’m introducing a resolution that will do just that. It will express its concern regarding the reported irregularities of the presidential election of 12 June, 2009. It will condemn the violence against demonstrators by pro-government militia in Tehran in the wake of the elections. It will affirm our belief in the universality of individual rights and the importance of democratic and fair elections. And lastly, and most importantly, it will express the support of the American people for all Iranian citizens who struggle for freedom, civil liberties and the protection of the rule of law.

Believe it or not in my small town of Columbus, IN, I grew up next door to a Hungarian immigrant who fled Hungary in the wake of the Soviet repression of the Hungarian revolution in 1956. I sat often with Julius Perr, now passed away, and heard of the way the Hungarian people, inspired by our calls for freedom, stood up for their own freedom. And as Brett Stephens recounts in today’s Wall Street Journal we stood by idly. We didn’t want to interfere. And the Soviet tanks rolled.

We cannot stand idly by, speak of Iran’s sovereignty, speak of her own right to choose her own leadership at a time when hundreds of thousands of Iranians are risking their lives to stand up for free elections and democracy.

Ronald Reagan said, “No arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.” All of us desire a fresh start with Iran and it seems from news reports and the extraordinary images coming from the streets of Iran that millions of Iranians long for a new start in their government. There is a reformist movement afoot in Iran.

Today I’ll introduce a resolution. I urge all my colleagues in both parties to join me in expressing their support for these brave and courageous men and women.



  1. PattyW says:

    BHO has to be very careful on his backing of the LOSERS of an obviously rigged election, if you get my drift…

  2. Reaganite Republican Resistance says:

    Isn’t this what George W Bush told you was going to happen in the Middle East?

    Maybe that’s why Barack Obama has so little apparent interest in finishing the job in Iran… no matter how much it benefits the US and free world.

    Anyone who expected him to act in the interests of the United States -rather than for his own political security- hasn’t taken a serious look at how Obama got this far in the first place.

  3. Rix says:

    Was I the only one to have a curious notion that Obama is learning from his Muslim brethren? I definitely expect similar occurrences in 2010 and 2012 – maybe without shooting yet.

  4. Anonymous says:

    A little off subject, but not entirely, is the recent court ruling in the U.K. and the U.S. Attorney's suit against a newspaper in Nevada claiming that anonymity of on-line commentors is not a protected right should concern all of us.

    Are you following this, Jeff, and, if so, what is your take on it?

    Old Bob

  5. tm says:

    It's very difficult for a chicago thug to take a strong stand on anything.
    Better to just vote "present."

  6. Gail B says:

    Sounds eerily ominous, doesn't it?!

  7. Uncle Rick says:

    The Middle Eastern bad guys (and maybe the good ones, too; I don't know) clearly can't think things through. It evidently occurred to no one that, if they were going to steal this election, they should at least make it *appear* to have been legit. They just took their 'results' and ran with them. No deep planning, no considering potential outcomes or — heavens forbid! — what others might think.

    What does this tell us about their ability to exercise restraint in any situation in which they are emotionally invested?

    Just thinkin' out loud.

Speak Your Mind