Stimulating Voter Fraud and Perpetuating Psychosis

By Rick Saunders
America’s Right

Well, the lunacy of the new messiah’s administration just keeps on getting deeper and more spectacular. The latest nugget of information to come out of the amazing, Technicolor® “stimulus” bill being peddled by President Barack Obama and his House acolytes is a provision allocating up to 5.2 billion taxpayer dollars to that paragon of virtuous voter registration facilitators: ACORN.

That’s right. Courtesy of the House leadership–Speaker Nancy “Partnership-Not-Partisanship” Pelosi and the president–up to $5,200,000,000.00 of not only your taxpayer dollars but also likely the dollars belonging to your children and grandchildren when they too become taxpayers will be allocated and directed in ways making it much easier for “neighborhood stabilization” groups like the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now to get their mitts on them. As noted by Matthew Vadum of the Capitol Research Center writing in American Spectator:

Although ACORN operatives usually get their hands on such funds only after they have first passed through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or state and local governments, the new spending bill largely eliminates these dawdling middle men, making it easier to get Uncle Sam’s largess directly into the hands of the same people who run ACORN’s various vote fraud and extortion rackets. And the legislative package provides these funds without the usual prohibition on using government money for lobbying or political activities.

Don’t you just love the smell of Chicago machine politics in the morning? Especially on the Potomac?

Now, there will no longer be even the charade of ACORN activists having no legislative or political agenda. The new administration hasn’t even been in office for two weeks, but guess what, Virginia? We now stand on the verge of mortgaging our descendants’ futures for decades, if not scores of decades. Ah, change.

If a Republican administration even thought of proposing half of the goofy, hardly stimulative spending strewn through the bill passed yesterday by the House of Representatives (such as, for example, the zero-heavy thank-you note written to ACORN), the reaction of the Democrats and the media and, of course, the always sagacious Michael Moore, would be beyond apoplectic. Remember what happened to Trent Lott when he wished “happy birthday” to Strom Thurmond? Remember the wide stance? But when a Democrat makes such proposals and backs them up with selected pejoratives directed at the Republicans’ “politics of fear” and “divisiveness,” the media, the DNC and the nuts at ACORN suck it up like so much adult beverage through a straw.

Remember, too, that the origin of much of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage crises, leading directly to the stock and financial markets free-fall, came after ACORN “volunteers” bullied and badgered lending institutions into making loans to individuals who not only could not pay them back, but who up front were acknowledged as being non-creditworthy and incapable of meeting their mortgage payments. But, hey, in the ACORN/Democrat/socialism-lite environment that has come to define massive segments of this nation, the end justifies the means and equality of outcome trumps equality of opportunity. Besides, there are still way too many “rich” people out there and, by golly, we can’t stop now — it is time to “spread the wealth around.”

So, here we go again. The “stimulus” bill now being huckstered by the Democrats–with the cover, aid and comfort provided by the new occupant of the White House–will now likely “stimulate” ACORN into even more altruistic and benevolent, non-profit organizing, all to ensure that neighborhoods remain “stabilized” (i.e., solidly Democrat).

Is this a great country, or what?

Somebody please tell me when this madness will stop, because January 15, 2013 is a long time to endure this species of lunacy.

Rick Saunders is a freelance writer who splits his time between endeavors in southern California and the American southwest. He began writing for America’s Right in December 2008.



  1. gailbullock says:

    Rick, I knew that ACORN was getting money from the Stimulus Package. When I got to the 00000000s, however, I didn’t know why the numbers got blurry. Then I realized that I would have to finish reading it later, when the shock of the amount would not make me cry. This is NOTHING but political PAYBACK!

    Obama wants to establish a national bank. Well, where’s he going to get the money to put into it? The Constitution gives him (or Congress) the authority to get into business.

    I did read that Obama’s popularity had dropped by 15 percentage points during his first week. Maybe he’ll make somebody mad enough to “leak” the vault copy of his BC or his passport used to travel to Pakistan in the 1980s.

    Why does my head keep turning back and forth? I just can’t believe all this! Jeff WILL put a post up in a couple of months and say, “April Fool!” won’t he?

  2. Anonymous says:

    I am with gail—-I don’t really know how much more of this I can take anymore!! I fear for our children’s future!! People are commiting suicide over the state of our economy. A man in California killed his entire family—wife and 5 children then himself!!! I feel that “we the people” are voiceless even though we have been screaming from the top of our lungs….PLEASE STOP ALL THE MADNESS!!!!

  3. JeanWTPUSA says:

    We can’t stop the Madness until we unify groups and organizations so we can create great strength in numbers. No one will listen. Read about the plan that will allow groups to work collaborative on a secure software platform.

    Groups fighting different causes can keep their identity and members, but they can share resources and information with other groups.

    Listen to Plains radio Chalice’s show on Jan 29th between 6-7PM CST or visit the United Coalition Groups page at this link.

  4. Ladalang says:

    Groups like ACORN and the like are just Socialism vehicles. They go out to poor neighborhoods and talk of all the great things they will get for free if they stand united and vote Democratic. Its a perpetuation of the welfare state. Once in the club these voters will vote D to sustain all the free stuff. They are oblivious to the freedoms they lose when the government is their daddy. But then again they don’t care, they don’t have to work.

  5. Anonymous says:

    The ACORN provision needs to be thrown out. I’ve heard on Fox news that this is one of the provisions the Republicans are looking to get tossed out before the final bill goes through Senate. Does anybody know anything more about this?


  6. Anonymous says:

    “We will start by cleaning up Congress, breaking the link between lobbyists and legislation and commit to pay-as-you-go, no new deficit spending.”
    -Nancy Pelosi, One Hundred Hours (Nov 7, 2006)

  7. Anonymous says:

    Sure, Rick, I’ll tell you when this madness will end… when we on the right decide to start the revolution that its going to take to overthrow… Oh! Did I say that out loud? I meant defeat these leftist bastards. Here we are sarcastically writting in disbelief what they are doing to this country… shaking our heads back and forth… almost like we are living in a nightmare dream… wondering when we’re going to wake up… Well good folks, this is your life and your country but sadder yet our childrens and grand childrens future we are watching slip away. Are we going to let that happen or will we fight to take it back? Start today. Don’t wait for instructions on how to get involved. Do something and remember this is war and there are no rules. Let’s roll!

  8. Anonymous says:

    According to Zogby, American people approve this stimulus plan and the direction this country is heading. Did Zogby go to the Obamian Kool aid drinkers party to do their polling?
    Also, I urge everyone to boycott Google search. Evidently, they have changed their algorthrim so only “good” searches on Obama will show up.
    Will someone please show me the way out of the Twilight Zone.


    IN my younger days of high school football practice we were continually drilled in the basics…the defense taught the skills of causing the opposing team to ‘cough up the ball’ likewise our offense the fundamental of covering up the ball…These basics if overlooked resulted in great pains to the perpetrator: case in point…the monetary issues affecting the several states.

    We the people are experiencing the effect of the resident aliens (aka tyrants with in the beltway) affectively avoiding the constitutional responsibility…untill these re-see the basic principle attested to in the organic law no party participation will turn the rudder.
    Great ideas of thought found here:
    see… Media
    our goal as defenders should be to strike the elected in such a way so as to make’em cough up the Keynesian ball they hold before another 1st and goal opportunity exists…in this super bowl for survival where stand ye?

  10. Anonymous says:

    The ACORN “thank you” note is really a pre-payment for keeping America Socialist/Totalitarian forever. Freedom/Liberty is quickly slipping away folks. If only we could wake up and shake off the monsters, but we can’t.

  11. Anonymous says:

    I’m with JeanWTPUSA! We need to unite and take action and not keep whining on blogs! Join and Start a united effort to make phone calls, write our reps and senators, do marches … and…
    If You Have Not Heard…

    Feb 1st is the 2009 Tea Party.!!! Everyone send a photo or a drawing of a tea bag…or cut the end off a tea box (DO NOT SEND A REAL TEA BAG) and send it to your state representatives. Everyone is sending one to Pelosi and Reid also!! You can google their address info.

    Write inside….Welcome To The Revolution! We’re Mad And We Are NOT Going To Take It Anymore!

    Mail Them On Feb 1st

    Tell Everyone!!!
    Thank You

  12. bullmoosegal says:

    You had to know he’d need to pay back those who got him into office. Turnabout is fair pay however, and we may need to resort to the same tactics in the end.

  13. gailbullock says:

    “Obama wants to establish a national bank. Well, where’s he going to get the money to put into it? The Constitution gives him (or Congress) the authority to get into business.”

    I meant “….The Constitution DOES NOT….”

  14. Gail B says:

    Received something on Solis, the Labor appointee:

    Will try to make a hyperlink for you. If it doesn’t work, cut the above and paste! It has a video, too.

    Hold put on Solis I’ll forward the email to Jeff and let him figure it out. (Maybe he will fix the link for me!)

  15. Anonymous says:

    Obama’s Bill Hands ACORN $5.2 Billion Bailout

    Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:06 PM

    By: David A. Patten Article Font Size

    A rising chorus of GOP leaders are protesting that the blockbuster Democratic stimulus package would provide up to a whopping $5.2 billion for ACORN, the left-leaning nonprofit group under federal investigation for massive voter fraud.

    Most of the money is secreted away under an item in the now $836 billion package titled “Neighborhood Stabilization Programs.”

    Ordinarily, neighborhood stabilization funds are distributed to local governments. But revised language in the stimulus bill would make the funds available directly to non-profit entities such as ACORN, the low-income housing organization whose pro-Democrat voter-registration activities have been blasted by Republicans. ACORN is cited by some for tipping the scales in the Democrats’ favor in November.

    According to Fox news, Sen. David Vitter, R-La., could appear to be a “payoff” for community groups’ partisan political activities in the last election cycle.

    “It is of great concern to me,” Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., tells Newsmax. “I think our government has stayed strong because we’ve had a two-party system, we have had robust debate, people have felt that it was one man-one vote. They are privileged and grateful that they have that ability to cast that vote. And when something is done to belittle or diminish that, it is of great concern to me.”

    Regarding ACORN, Blackburn added, “Additional funds going to these organizations that have tried to skew that system, it causes me great concern and I believe that it causes many of my colleagues great concern.”

  16. Anonymous says:

    When morons are elected to an office they cannot fill and they then gather as many of their moron friends together to help screw the people, you get what we have now. A big bunch of stupids (Democrats and Republicans) who only think of themselves.
    I heard that congress is trying to get a pay raise. I think it’s time they got a pay cut instead. They aren’t doing their jobs so they deserve a pay cut or they can get out on the local scene and try to find a job like some of the people that have lost their jobs from all the crap that the government has caused.

  17. Anonymous says:

    I am with gail—- I feel that “we the people” are voiceless even though we have been screaming from the top of our lungs….PLEASE STOP ALL THE MADNESS!!!!

    Keep screaming until your hoarse and get in their faces as you do it! Do not lose heart. Fight the good fight. We may lose but let it not be said we lost without a good fight.

    We have a serious case of myopia in this country. We have lost the ability to think generationally to our detriment, or more precisely, to our descendants’ detriment.

  18. Anonymous says:

    here to learn all about how the
    Economic Stimulus Bill Mandates Electronic Health Records
    for Every Citizen without Opt-out or Patient Consent Provisions.

    Brought to you by Mr. Transparency who has willingly shared his medical records with the public.


  19. Anonymous says:

    The Earned Income Tax Credit Obamas Stimulus Welfare Scam

    See at:

    Or click
    here to see.

  20. Sherry says:

    We have to make sure there is NO backing of this bill by the Republicans – I personally sent an email (see text below) to each Republican rep 2 days ago – it took less than an hour.

    The emails and phone calls made a difference with the House vote. MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!!!

    The polls this morning show that the bill is losing ground with public opinion – keep talking, writing and calling.

    I am respectfully contacting you regarding the planned Economic Stimulus package that is currently being sought.

    This bill will pass without the inclusion of any Republicans and it appears that the Democrats simply want to have the Republicans share the blame when this fails to boost the economy. Unfortunately, based on history this will fail and we need to have a strong leadership when the inevitable happens.

    This bill is not in the best interest of the people of this country and as you know most people are against many of the projects that will undoubtedly remain in this bill. Most notably any project that could ultimately end up in the hands of ACORN or any of its affiliates. This is outrageous and I would personally like to thank Senator Vitter for speaking out so eloquently on this matter.

    If this bill contains ANY projects that will not assist your constituency, you MUST vote against this bill. We need the Republican Party to show strength and stand together against this damaging bill. We are counting on you to represent our wishes and best interests.

    Any Republican vote for this bill will not be viewed as bipartisan; it will simply be seen as weak.
    You cannot have an impact on passing this bill; it will pass with or without your vote. The only true impact you can have is to unite against the bill.
    The only way this party has any chance of returning to a position of strength is to show some strength and stand by the principles of the party and your constituents.

    Please we do not need followers, we need leaders.

  21. Anonymous says:

    OMG–this bill is nearly all pure pork and no stimulus. Can there be any pigs still left on the farms? The DemoHogs are all around the trough, frantically swilling down their socialist garbage, and dreaming up more ‘stimulus’ for the taxpayers to pay. No tax cuts, just more socialist crap.

    Recently the WSJ said: “Practically every day the government launches a massively expensive new initiative to solve the problems the last day’s initiative did not.

    Or maybe that is the real plan, keep printing and spending billions — no, trillions of dollars that we don’t have and can’t pay for, until there is no money, no credit, and ultimately no America as we know it.

  22. Anonymous says:

    I agree with many of the comments. Fear will not get us anywhere. It will divide us and paralyze us. Now, is the time for unity, a plan, and above all action. We can blog all we want among ourselves and we will be still all by ourselves. There are many groups out there forming and one is The Patriotic Resistance. As a part of their efforts they are trying to organize a march on Washington known as “We the People” Restore Our Constitution March on 30 May and I am sure they could use some help and expertise. I am sure our founding fathers faced the same problems we are encountering and more, but they persevered and with a handful of people they presented their ideas to the public and they grew. They defeated the British and who would have imagined it. We are Americans and we are from the same stock as our forefathers. Let’s stop our whining and do something…something organized, but lets make it count and build on that until we cannot be ignored. Perhaps Jeff could give us some suggestions. Thanks. LACE

  23. Andrea says:

    Hi Jeff,
    I’m not law expert, but someone who knows a bit more than me should check this out. Because if it’s right… right.


  24. Claudia says:

    this from
    [WASHINGTON -- Defense going down and the Obama administration is preparing to make hard choices to end programs that exceed their budgets, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said.
    "The spigot of defense funding opened by 9/11 is closing," Gates told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday.

    The demands of wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, along with the nation's economic crisis, require military planners to separate "those things that are desirable from those things that are truly needed" in the way of new weapons, Gates added.

    He suggested that the new administration will avoid across-the-board spending reductions, "which inefficiently extend all programs," and will try to save money by eliminating unneeded programs.]

    And yet they (Obama) want to give Obamas thugs 5.2 BILLION for ACORN thuuggey, when they are going to cut weapons and armour for our Soldiers in other places……

  25. Anonymous says:


    Don’t forget the condoms!

    Oh, I guess Obama could spin these as “body armor.”

  26. Claudia says:

    it is RIGHT, Andie, and I urge you to join in and get to work, we need al lthe help we can get, and go to Jean’s site also at:

    GET INVOLVED and lets see if we can get these problems taken care of,, IF WE DON’T WE WILL LOSE OUR PRECIOUS COUNTRY….

  27. Anonymous says:

    AND…these jerks gave themselves a PAY RAISE!!!!!!!!

    I have called my senators today.

  28. tanarg says:

    Rick Saunders wrote: “The latest nugget of information to come out of the amazing, Technicolor® “stimulus” bill being peddled by President Barack Obama and his House acolytes is a provision allocating up to 5.2 billion taxpayer dollars to that paragon of virtuous voter registration facilitators: ACORN.”

    Actually, Rick, you should have written (your first sentence) “up to 5.2 billion taxpayer dollars to *organizations like* that paragon of virtuous voter registration facilitators: ACORN.”

  29. Andrea says:


    No matter how much I would like to live in the US, we are Canadian. I still root for you… and help if can, but I’m not a voter there.
    US was the last one standing against this socialist nonsense.

  30. Mad Mama says:

    Hi Gailbullock,

    I’ve recently been trying to educate myself on how the economy works and how we should protect ourselves and our investments. It’s been an eye-opening journey. I’d heard before that the Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal Express and the two sites I’ve linked to at the end of this post explain why that’s true in terms I could understand.

    Congress does have the power to create money, debt-free money, instead of borrowing through private banking institutions. In fact, this was the Framer’s intent. We’ve bobbled back and forth since Independence with doing this, but Woodrow Wilson signed us away in 1913 and since, we’ve been lead to believe the Federal Reserve is an arm of the government. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    I think you’re correct in stating Congress has no power to found a National Bank, especially one that operates on fractional banking since this is also a problem directly related to the banking cartel that’s causing the financial bust we’re having now. I tend to think what Obama is talking about is just another arm for the banking cartel and not what the Framers had in mind.

    The video is long, over 3 hours, but well worth watching. The narrator explains the entire history of banking and how bankers have taken control of governments and how they manipulate the market for political and monetary power. History buffs will appreciate the detail and the corroborating facts and statements made by economists and politicians through the years.

    It make my blood boil. But we all know the saying: Money is the root of all evil. I’ve come to think this is where we are going to have start to stop the madness. We have been and are being manipulated by outside influences that if not removed, nothing will change for the better. Things will only get worse and I’m sorry to say, that’s the plan. This outside control is, indeed, the root of our financial woes and the most alarming fact is that is does not have to be and should not be this way. A grassroots fire needs to be lit and We the People need to demand we get out of the current system–now. But it will take educating the public and our representatives to do this. It’ll be one heck of a fight with all the disinformation that will be spewed by those who want to protect their cash cow, but we’ll continue to be enslaved to this banking cartel if we don’t toss them out and reclaim our Republic.

  31. foytik says:

    All this government largess has me wishing I could get in on the gravy train. Maybe I should apply for some of those “neighborhood stabilization funds”. I’m sure I could find some good shovel ready programs around my neighborhood. Swimming pools for all!
    Critics of the stimulus complain that not enough of the money will be spent soon enough. Amazing that congress’s problem is they cant figure out how to spend money fast enough. Imagine a congressman being told that he has to find ways to spend more money faster. Makes my head spin. Maybe I could get a consulting contract to help them spend more. Then I would have cost overruns, and get a bonus for it!

  32. Claudia says:

    OK folks, here comes a biggie, now HE wants the Military to take an OATH TO HIM….
    Picked this up from another site:

    [Conservative News and Reporting
    "News for the Rest of Us"
    Michele Chang

    Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with orders that the White House is contemplating. According to sources at the Pentagon, including all branches of the armed forces, the Obama Administration may break with a centuries-old tradition.

    A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no longer to the Constitution.

    "The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document itself." the spokesman said, "At no time in American history, not even in the Civil War, did the oath change or the subject of the oath differ. It has always been to the Constitution."

    The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense Department was expected as President George W. Bush left office. President Obama has already signed orders to close Guantanamo and to pull combat troops from Iraq. But, this, say many at the Defense Department, goes to far.

    "Technically, we can't talk about it before it becomes official policy." the spokesman continued. "However, the Defense Department, including the Secretary, will not take this laying down. Expect a fight from the bureaucracy and the brass."

    Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, the rationale for the change was made more clear.

    "The President feels that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities like those at Abu Ghraib."

    "We expect a lot of flak over this," the classified memo continues. "But those that would be most against it are those looking either for attention or control."]

    THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!!!!! This is a way for him to circumvent the Military possibly taking him oout of office by them NOT defending HIM.

  33. Anonymous says:

    Funny stuff.

    BO the military leader is as absurd as Pelosi the nun.

    No, their gig is Gen. Pelosi and the kool-aid man.

  34. Kathy says:

    “Money is the root of all evil.” Actually, people frequently misquote this Bible verse. It’s: “The love (or lust) of money is the root of all evil.”

    We don’t know if the military oath thing is just rumor or not. I’ve contacted my senator and congressman about it (and tried to contact the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but their servers were too busy) because I would not put it past obama to do something like that. Remember, folks, audacity is a hallmark of the obama mindset.

    Good article Rick. You hit it hard and keep it between the lines!

  35. Mad Mama says:

    LOL! Thanks, Kathy. I’m okay with that. It’s an even better quote.

  36. Anonymous says:

    Claudia – this info you put out about the oath BO wants the military to make to HIM needs to be heard by all in this country – Rush and Hannity need to hear it and Glenn Beck – and we all do need to participate in the Tea Party Feb 1st – what a powerful statement !
    we must collectively start making our voices heard before our children face a worse fate – for their sake we have to step up to the plate ! Thank you and I plan on passing this info around – our children attend a school largely made up of military families – God Bless these families who sacrifice so much , EMHD

  37. says:

    Claudia – you do know that story at Jumping in Pools was satire right? It even said so on the cloud tags at the bottom…..

  38. JeanWTPUSA says:

    Mario Puzzo’s Military suit just had a motion to dismiss regarding, once again, the “Standing” issue.
    Why does “injury in fact” have to be “injury to one’s person?” The law is clear that an injury can be to one’s constitutional rights.

    I am not even a lawyer and I am certain that I could come up with a creative way to get around this “Standing Issue.”

    Please read this post and maybe there is something that can help YOU and other attorneys come up with some creative legal maneuvers by using the Department of Justice’s “How To Prosecute Election Fraud Manual” against them:

    More sections may apply that may offer Puzzo and other attorneys a creative way of overcoming the “Standing” issue.

    In the Conspiracy Against Rights. 18 U.S.C. § 241, Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to “conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States” under color of law.

    Section 241 has been an important statutory tool in election crime prosecutions. Originally held to apply only to schemes to corrupt elections.

    Section 241 does not require that the conspiracy be successful, nor any PROOF of an overt act.

    Section 241 embrace conspiracies intended to injure because an injury does NOT really even need to occur?

    Why does an “injury have to be a physical injury?” Why can’t it be injury to one’s mental and emotional state? Why not an injury to one’s confidence in government?

    I don’t understand why this doesn’t matter apply to these cases and why attorneys continue to do the SAME THING over and over again seem to expect to have DIFFERENT results?

  39. Anonymous says:

    Call the bill “Dimocrat Voters buying bill”.
    Someone should design a ‘Dimocrat Voters Buying Bill’ in the image of a billion dollar note on the web for distribution to the Dimocrats

  40. Anonymous says:

    It ain’t over til its over!

    Congress sued to remove
    prez from White House
    ‘Defendants had to ensure
    the Constitution is upheld’

    Posted: January 31, 2009
    12:00 am Eastern

    © 2009 WorldNetDaily

    A new lawsuit is challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, and this one targets Congress as a defendant for its “failure” to uphold the constitutional demand to make sure Obama qualified before approving the Electoral College vote that actually designated him as the occupant of the Oval Office.

    The new case raises many of the same arguments as dozens of other cases that have flooded into courtrooms around the nation since the November election.

    It is being brought on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. and names as defendants Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

    Where’s the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the “natural-born American” clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 193,000 others and sign up now!

    As WND has reported, dozens of lawsuits have been filed over Obama’s eligibility to assume the office of the president. Many have been dismissed while others remain pending.

    The cases, in various ways, have alleged Obama does not meet the “natural born citizen” clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

  41. suek says:

    Just a question…

    Is there any reason why the vault copy of Obama’s birth certificate could not be forged? Are hard copies of _all_ birth certificates filed and stored (in Hawaii)? Of course, his would have been issued before computers, but have the old ones been stored? or have they been stored as microfilms? or computer records?

    Technically, I certainly have no idea what the vault copy long form should look like so am dependent on those who _do_ know. If there’s someone in the Hawaiian government who decided to produce a forged copy, is there anyone who would be able to prove or disprove it? (I’m aware of the conflict over what _has_ been presented, but just wondering about other possibilities)

    Of course, you do have to wonder why such a simple solution has not been provided by Obama already…
    It would probably take an “inside” person, but I also wonder how hard that would be.

  42. JeanWTPUSA says:

    Just a quick clarification of my above post regarding the MTD on the Puzzo Military Suit.

    I am not stating that section 241 will be the winning arguement, like I said, I am not even an attorney, and for that reason, sometimes, someone like me, may be able to see things that others don’t or may be able to offer a suggestion that a skilled attorney can run with.

    The DOJ manual on how to prosecute Election Crimes and Fraud is 384 pages. There is a link to it in my original post, which is a letter that I had sent prevously sent to the DOJ and FBI regarding this matter.

    My only purpose in bringing this up at all, was to stress that point, that the attorneys that are filing these lawsuits have to “start thinking out of the box.” The arguments that are being used, continually seems to fail, case after case.

    This reminds me of a story I heard long ago. It was the story of a truck that was stuck under an overpass and a number of engineers were called in to figure out how to get the truck out. The truck was completely wedged under the overpass and the top part of the truck was partially crushed.

    The engineers began to scratch their heads, one suggested that they would should bring in equipment to lift the overpass, another suggested that the top section of the truck would have to be cut off. Then a little boy riding his bike came up to the scene and informed the engineers that if they let the air out of the truck’s tires, the truck would fall lower than the overpass and it could be rolled out. And, presto, the problem of the stuck truck was solved, by a little boy that was looking at the problem with a fresh set of eyes.

    I am not trying to belittle or minimize the legal work that is being done or the legal arguments that are being made. I am only trying to look at the legal arguments with a “fresh set of eyes,” and make observations that may help someone try a “new approach.” Something that could make the “lightbulb” go on in someone’s head, so they start to think “outside of the box.”

    My only pupose in writing the original comment is to ask, “If we let air out of the tires, could we make a better case?”

  43. PEME says:


    Ne’re Do Wells

    word verification strungs def. past tense plural ebonics of strings i.e. Who pulled his strungs?

Speak Your Mind