The "Sarah Obama Tape"

*** WARNING — Please Read ***

As I wrote on Friday, this whole thing does not sit well with me. I’ve heard the tape, read the transcripts and the affidavits, and just don’t know what to make of it. I don’t particularly think that it smells right, but feel that IT IS NOT MY PLACE TO SUPPRESS INFORMATION.

Read the information, listen to the tape and decide for yourself. That’s how it should be, isn’t it? Stop with the agenda-setting, just give the information to the people and let them decide what they think. Personally, while I’ve been open to the idea that Barack Obama has not been entirely truthful with regard to his background, something here does not seem right.

Since Berg filed his suit in late August, I’ve done my best to give you the information as I get it, and I have tried to present both sides of the argument. This is no different. This information is included in Berg’s filing and, while it just doesn’t sit right, we’re too close to the election for anything but full disclosure.

Again, I DO NOT FEEL IT IS MY PLACE TO SUPPRESS INFORMATION.

To me, this has little to do with Obama, a man who I do feel is not right for America because of his radical ideology and questionable associations and alliances. This has to do with the availability of all information on all political candidates. If there were something out there which would raise questions about John McCain’s fitness or eligibility for the presidency, I’d want it out for public consumption and debate.

Decide for yourself with regard to the information below. I already have, and if you’re still wondering what I think, re-read this warning and notice that I’ve never before felt it necessary to include such a disclaimer at America’s Right.

So, to borrow a phrase from a much maligned news organization, when it comes to the information below … we REPORT, you DECIDE.

– Jeff Schreiber

For the better part of two weeks, Philip Berg has been talking about evidence that Illinois Sen. Barack Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya and not Honolulu, Hawaii as the senator contends, specifically a taped interview with Sarah Onyango Obama, paternal grandmother of Barack Obama, in her home in Kenya after the third and final presidential debate during which she states that her famous grandson was born in Kenya, and that she was indeed present for his birth.

At first, Berg insisted that he still had some legal issues to resolve before releasing the audiotape itself [which is in Swahili]. While he did not include the tape itself in his recent filings with the United States Supreme Court, he included the transcript of the conversation, sworn affidavits from people involved here and in Kenya, as well as e-mail messages exchanged between the two ministers involved.

The first of the two contacts is Rev. Kweli Shuhubia. His name, as it appears within the filings, has been changed for the sake of his safety considering the political climate in Kenya, not to mention here as well. According to his affidavit, Shuhubia is an ordained minister, native evangelist and translator for the Anabaptist churches in Kenya.

On October 16, at the insistence of the second contact, he traveled to the home of Sarah Obama in the village of Alego-Kogello, and found it to be “heavily guarded by Kenya Police” and “flooded with people who were celebrating Senator Obama’s success story.” He took photographs of Sarah Obama, another grandson who was present, and other family members.

The second contact is Bishop Ronald McRae. In his affidavit, McRae states that he “oversees the Anabaptists Churches in North America” and also serves as “Presiding Elder on the African Presbytery,” where he assists in oversight for churches in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and mission work in other locations there. During his travels, he says in his affidavit, “United States Senator Barack Hussein Obama is a very popular topic of discussion.”

What the affidavit and the Court filings do not mention, however, is that McRae is better known stateside as a “street minister,” and that his “bishop” title is largely self-applied. A September 10, 2005 article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette describes McRae as a “self-proclaimed Anabaptist bishop” who “has felt it his calling to disrupt the lives of gays, Catholics, Mormons, Muslims, Jehovah’s Witnesses and whatever other among the citizenry he considers the future entree at the Almighty’s celestial barbecue come Judgment Day.” He made news that day for denouncing the design of the Shanksville, PA memorial to those who perished on Flight 93 as a “symbol of Islam” because the finished product would resemble a red crescent in the autumn months, when the leaves on the maple trees would turn red. To his credit, I guess it would, but cannot imagine that appeasement of radical Islam was behind the design.

This, nonetheless, is the gentleman who brought the tape of Sarah Obama to the world.

Phil Berg was not aware of McRae’s history as a “street minister” or as denouncer of crash site memorial designs–yes, I indeed thought it ironic that Berg, a man who believes that the United States government was complicitous in the attacks of September 11, 2001, was relying on a man who felt that the planned memorial to those who died on that awful day was woefully inadequate–but said that he nonetheless “feels comfortable that it’s right.”

“Say what you want about the man,” Berg said, “but he has spent considerable time in Kenya, and the minister on the ground over there has known Obama’s grandmother for years. Given the nature of the e-mails and such, I have no reason to believe that this isn’t right.”

The telephone records attached to filings do indeed add up, showing that there were indeed telephone calls between Kenya and a Detroit, MI telephone number–presumably McRae’s–on the dates provided in the affidavits. Furthermore, apart from information that Sarah Obama’s comments were translated from Swahili, a language of which a February 2008 article in The New York Times suggests that she speaks only little, the affidavits taken alone are interesting, if not compelling.

First, from Rev. Kweli Shuhubia’s sworn affidavit::

During my interview of Sarah Obama; I called Bishop Ron McRae in the United States from my mobile number. I advised Bishop McRae that I was present with Ms. Obama in her home, and wished for him to speak with her. Bishop McRae informed me he would call me right back, to avoid the international costs on my personal mobile phone. Bishop McRae subsequently called me back; Bishop McRae requested permission to electronically record his telephone conversations with Ms. Obama, to which I agreed. Due to bad telephone connections Bishop McRae had to call me back three [3] times, before we were able to continue our conversation. The telephone interview conducted by Bishop McRae was conducted on loud speaker (speaker phone). During the interview conversation, one of Ms. Obama’s grandsons and myself acted as Swahili translators, and as Bishop McRae talked to and questioned Ms. Obama, we would translate what Bishop McRae said to Ms. Obama in Swahili, and then we would translate her Swahili responses to Bishop McRae in English. Ms. Obama can fluently speak Swahili in her native dialect, but cannot read or write.

Bishop McRae asked Ms. Obama specifically, “Were you present when your grandson Barack Obama was born in Kenya?” This was asked to her in translation twice, and both times she specifically replied, “Yes”. It appeared Ms. Obama’s relatives and her grandson, handling the translating, had obviously been versed to counter such facts with the purported information from the American news media that Obama was born in Hawaii. Despite this, Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama was very adamant that her grandson, Senator Barack Hussein Obama, was born in Kenya, and that she was present and witnessed his birth in Kenya, not the United States. When Ms. Obama’s grandson attempted to counter his grandmother’s clear responses to the question, verifying the birth of Senator Obama in Kenya, Bishop McRae asked her grandson, how she could be present at Barack Obama’s birth if the Senator was born in Hawaii, but the grandson would not answer the question, instead he repeatedly tried to insert that, “No, No, No. He was born in the United States!” But during the conversation, Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama never changed her reply that she was in deed present when Senator Barack Obama was born in Kenya. A copy of the Tape transcript is attached hereto as EXHIBIT “A”.

I left Kisumu City and traveled to Mombosa, Kenya. I interviewed personnel at the hospital in which Senator Obama was born in Kenya. I then had meetings with the Provincial Civil Registrar. I learned there were records of Ann Dunham giving birth to Barack Hussein Obama, III in Mombosa, Kenya on August 4, 1961. I spoke directly with an Official, the Principal Registrar, who openly confirmed the birthing records of Senator Barack H. Obama, Jr. and his mother were present, however, the file on Barack H. Obama, Jr. was classified and profiled. The Official explained Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. birth in Kenya is top secret. I was further instructed to go to the Attorney General’s Office and to the Minister in Charge of Immigration if I wanted further information.

Second, a excerpt from Ronald McRae’s affidavit:

Since Senator Obama’s birth was reportedly in 1961, birth records may or may not be available, so I felt it very important to obtain the testimony of his grandmother as a first hand witness, since it is commonly known throughout Kenya, and especially around the Kisumu area, that Sarah Obama was present when Barack Obama, Jr. was born in Kenya.

Accordingly, on Thursday, October 16, 2008 Reverend Kweli Shuhubia (actual name temporarily withheld to protect his life), an evangelist with our ministries in Kenya traveled to Kogello and located Ms. Sarah Obama at her home, see the attached email, attached as Exhibit “4”.

Rev. Shuhubia is a very intelligent and educated citizen of Kenya, a former teacher and respected evangelist throughout Kenya. Rev. Shuhubia met and interviewed Ms. Sarah Obama at length on October 16th, during which interview; he called me on my mobile number, see my phone record attached as Exhibit “5”. Rev. Shuhubia advised that he was present with Ms. Obama in her home, and wished for me to speak with her. I advised Mr. Shuhubia that I would call him right back, to avoid the international costs on his personal mobile phone. I subsequently called him back, and requested permission to electronically record his telephone conversations and the conversations with him and Ms. Obama, to which he agreed. Because of static and bad connections I had to call him three times, before we were able to continue our conversation. In that conversation, Mr. Shuhubia and one grandson of Ms. Sarah Obama acted as Swahili translators, and as I talked to and questioned Ms. Obama, they would translate what I said to her in Swahili, and then they would translate her Swahili responses to me in English. Ms. Obama can fluently speak Swahili in her native dialect, but cannot read or write. In the ensuing conversation, I asked Ms. Obama specifically, “Were you present when your grandson Barack Obama was born in Kenya?” This was asked to her in translation twice, and both times she specifically replied, “Yes”. Though, some few younger relatives, including her grandson doing the translating, have obviously been versed to counter such facts with the common purported information from the American news media that Obama was born in Hawaii, Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama was very adamant that her grandson, Senator Barack Hussein Obama, was born in Kenya, and that she was present and witnessed his birth in Kenya, not the United States. When Ms. Obama’s grandson attempted to counter his grandmother’s clear responses to the question, verifying the birth of Senator Obama in Kenya, I asked her grandson, how she could be present at Barack Obama’s birth if the Senator was born in Hawaii, but the grandson would not answer the question, instead he repeatedly tried to insert that, “No, No, No. He was born in the United States!” But during the conversation, Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama never changed her reply that she was in deed present when Senator Barack Obama was born in Kenya. A transcript of this taped interview is attached as Exhibit “6”.

Mr. Shuhubia took photographs during the meeting and interview with Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama, which photos will be forthcoming.

Because of the seriousness of the political situation and the impact of such on a United States Presidential election, and because of the factual reality of tremendous violence in Kenya towards Christians, especially in the immediate area of Kisumu, where both Sarah Hussein Obama and Rev. Kweli Shuhubia live, it is requested that all reasonable and legal steps be taken to secure Rev. Kweli Shuhubia’s identity to the Federal Court alone, in order to protect his life and safety for being willing to provide this very important assistance in gathering this testimony and evidence to be used in any Federal litigation.

The filings with the Supreme Court–which, to the best of my knowledge, cannot actually be considered by the Court because they were not included with the original proceedings at the district court level–also include a transcript. In the transcript, there is a good deal of language that I sure cannot translate. Click on the image below to see it, copied as it appears in the Supreme Court filing.

The Court filings also contain images of e-mails exchanged between Bishop Ron McCrae and the Rev. Kweli Shuhubia. Like with the transcript, I’ve captured them from Berg’s Supreme Court filings and reproduced them here.

The second e-mail clearly shows that Shuhubia’s efforts to obtain birthing records and other documentation from officials in Kenya came after similar information-gathering efforts made by WorldNetDaily writer and The Obama Nation author Jerome Corsi who, according to the e-mail, offered $2,000 in exchange for any such information. Corsi, however, says that he doesn’t work that way.

“I haven’t made any bribes and haven’t been involved in any bribes,” Corsi told America’s Right this afternoon. “There have been reports that people have made bribes on my behalf, and indeed WorldNetDaily reported that money exchanged hands to facilitate my removal from Kenya after I had been detained. However, I think payment of bribes for information is wrong, I think bribery gets bad information, and for those reasons I refuse to pay a penny, always have and always will, and refuse to reimburse anyone who pays a bribe on my behalf.”

So there you have it. A tinny, hard-to-discern audio recording. Affidavits from people with changed names and a history of questionable conduct. E-mails which likely show what looks to be at least one fabricated detail. Here’s the evidence we’ve all been clamoring for.

Take it, digest it, and decide for yourself.

You know, on the night that African Press International first reported that Michelle Obama had contacted them and said inflammatory things, I wrote that it just didn’t smell right, it just didn’t add up. Yes, over the following few days, I got caught up in the misrepresentations made by that fly-by-night organization, but in the end stuck with my gut feeling that something just wasn’t right.

My coverage of Berg v. Obama has been, to me, about reporting to you the facts and underlying information, procedure and motivations behind Philip Berg’s lawsuit as it progressed through the courts. I’ve provided you with the information as I have received it, whether from the newest filings in the court or from Berg himself. Throughout, I have attempted to provide you as best I can with a look into the rules and procedure on both sides of this civil action.

While I am certainly concerned for our nation and absolutely certain that Barack Obama has not been completely forthright when it comes to his past, whether it be about his ideological perspective, his friendships, his alliances or his personal background, I have refrained from making blind accusations or participating in wild conspiracy theories–hence the lack of material about Andy Martin’s business in Hawaii, claiming that Frank Marshall Davis was Barack Obama’s true father–because my interest is solely in the truth, and my jurisdiction is what I can physically see, smell and touch. This is why I kick myself for getting caught up in the Internet fodder surrounding African Press International. This is why I am so hesitant to make the information above available without expressly stating my lack of trust in its authenticity.

Still, who am I to conceal information publicly available but not easily accessible? Who am I to hide, from people who wish to decide for themselves, anything which may help them better understand the choice before them on Tuesday?

In the end, I hope that each and every one of you will pull that lever or push that button based upon more than a tinny conversation between someone purported to be Barack Obama’s grandmother and a man who proclaims himself a bishop and sees red crescents in the autumnal hillsides of western Pennsylvania. This is an election of vast differences — treat it that way. Instead of wondering just where Barack Obama was born, ask yourself whether you want government more or less involved in your daily lives, whether you’re a capitalist or a socialist, whether you feel paying higher taxes is “patriotic,” whether you value the unborn lives of the most defenseless among us, whether you want our fighting men and women home immediately or home with honor, or whether you feel that America’s best days are in front of Her, or that the days of Lady Liberty as that shining city on a hill have gone by.

I hope I’ve made my point. As with anything else you’ve seen, heard or read during the past two years, take it in and decide for yourself. Personally, I’m a conservative, and will stick with the candidate I feel is best fit to preserve, for later generations, the tenets and benefits of conservatism — and I’ll do so with or without Bishop Ron McRae, Sarah Obama, Lolo Soetoro, or Philip Berg.

To listen to the audio, click HERE or, if needed, HERE.

Share

Comments

  1. Anonymous says:

    No problem Jeff! I’m a newbie to your site. Thanks for all your hard work!

  2. Anonymous says:

    Jeff,
    Thanks for all this. Sticking your neck out is scary at best, and you’ve been quite the gentleman doing it.

    But, I want to know when your “secret” project that will never have your name on it, is going to appear. How will we identify it?

    Glenn Flowers

  3. Anonymous says:

    Anonymous said…
    Let me say this, my dear readers. I do not believe the information posted below is true. And I cannot be held responsible for any lies it may contain.

    However, I so greatly respect the first amendment that I must post this false information, because Obama is a socialist commie muslim nigger.
    ___________________________

    Hmmmmm And what evidence do you have, to prove that this is false information?

  4. Anonymous says:

    I have been silently following this since the beginning. Have one question. IF Big O was NOT born in Kenya, WHY would it be necessary to seal BIRTH RECORDS in Kenya? They simply would NOT exist. No?

  5. PatGund@gmail.com says:

    The Connecticut case has been dismissed:

    http://www.nypost.com/seven/11032008/news/nationalnews/judge_dismisses_obama_birth_certificate__136631.htm

    And the Virginia case, the one where the Board of Elections submitted a copy of the COLB WITH an affidavit from the State Health Director (of Hawaii) verifying that the document is an authentic certification of live birth, has been dismissed. In this case, it goes beyond mere dismissal, as the judge ruled against each arguement, (COLB, Dual Citizenship, Indonesian citizenship, etc.

    http://comments.obamacrimes.com/blog/_archives/2008/11/2/3959876.html?message=#1187739

    ""The Court made the following findings:

    1. The Certification of Live Birth presented to the court is unquestionably authentic.
    The court noted that the certification had a raised seal from the state of Hawaii, had a stamp bearing the signature of the registrar of vital statistics. The court found “wholly unpersuasive” any of the internet claims that the birth certificate was altered in any way. Furthermore, the document itself was accompanied by an affidavit from the State Health Director (of Hawaii) verifying that the document is an authentic certification of live birth. The court held that there could be no doubt that the document was authentic unless one believed that the state of Hawaii’s health department were in on an elaborate and complex conspiracy – and that there is not a shred of evidence that this is the case.

    2. The Certification of Live Birth establishes that Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen. The affidavit of the State Health Director states that the information on the CLOB is identical to the information on the “vault” copy of the birth certificate, and that both documents establish that Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu. The Court noted that the CLOB is valid for all citizenship purposes. The court noted our argument that the COLB is not valid for determining citizenship, but referred us to Hawaiian law that states otherwise. “There is no difference between a certificate and a certification of live birth in the eyes of the state. For instance, either can be used to confirm U.S. citizenship to obtain a passport or state ID.” The court found that Hawaiian law makes the COLB valid for all purposes with the exception of determining native Hawaiian heritage for certain state and federal benefits. The court held that if Mr. Obama were born elsewhere and the birth registered in Hawaii, the “place of birth” line on the COLB would reflect that fact. The court stated that there could be no doubt that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii and that any argument to the contrary was fanciful and relied on completely unsubstantiated internet rumors.

    3. For that reason, 8 U.S.C. §1401(g), which at the relevant time provided as follows:

    “The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: ***(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years:…..

    is irrelevant to this matter, as Mr. Obama was conclusively born in Hawaii.

    4. Mr. Obama did hold dual citizenship in the U.S. and Kenya until he became an adult. When Barack Obama Jr. was born Kenya was a British colony. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.'s children:
    “British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.”
    In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UK. Obama's UK citizenship became an Kenyan citizenship on Dec. 12, 1963, when Kenya formally gained its independence from the United Kingdom. The court noted that Chapter VI, Section 87 of the Kenyan Constitution specifies that:
    1. Every person who, having been born in Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963…
    2. Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become, a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963.
    Thus the court held that as a citizen of the UK who was born in Kenya, Obama's father automatically received Kenyan citizenship via subsection (1). So given that Obama qualified for citizen of the UK status at birth and given that Obama's father became a Kenyan citizen via subsection (1), thus Obama did in fact have Kenyan citizenship in 1963. However, the court further held that the Kenyan Constitution prohibits dual citizenship for adults. Kenya recognizes dual citizenship for children, but Kenya's Constitution specifies that at age 21, Kenyan citizens who possesses citizenship in more than one country automatically lose their Kenyan citizenship unless they formally renounce any non-Kenyan citizenship and swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya. The court held that there was no evidence that Mr. Obama has ever renounced his U.S. citizenship or sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982.
    The court held that there was no legal requirement that Mr. Obama renounce his Kenyan citizenship or affirm his U.S. citizenship in order to maintain his status as a natural born citizen.

    5. Mr. Obama did not lose his U.S. Citizenship based on the acts of his parents, including adoption by an Indonesian citizen. The Court held that no action taken by the parents of an American child can strip that child of his citizenship. The court cited to the 1952 Immigration & Nationality Act, Title III, Chapter 3, Sections 349 and 355, which was in effect in the late 1960s when Obama went to Indonesia, and which stated that a minor does not lose his US citizenship upon the naturalization of his parents or any other actions of his parents, so long as the minor returns to the US and establishes permanent US residency before the age of 21. Thus the adoption of Obama did not serve to strip him of his U.S. citizenship. The fact that Indonesian law does not allow dual citizenship is irrelevant, as U.S. law controls. Furthermore, the Court held that traveling on a foreign passport does not strip an American of his citizenship. The Court noted first that there was no evidence that Mr. Obama traveled on an Indonesian passport (Mr. Berg and others we reached out to for evidence never provided any evidence of this claim or any other of the claims we could have used some proof of.) Nonetheless, the court held that such travel does not divest an American of his citizenship.

    he Court makes other holdings and findings that I won’t bother you with here. Needless to say, the decision is wholly against us. The court finds the claims against Mr. Obama’s citizenship “wholly unpersuasive and bordering on the frivolous, especially in light of the complete absence of any first-hand evidence on any critical issue” and further classifies it as “conspiracy theory of the lowest sort, fueled by nothing than internet rumor and those who truly want to believe egging each other on."

    The gentleman who filed the suit will not appeal, saying:

    “”As I say above, I think the proper and legal way to contest this issue is in the congress. That is where we should focus our attention. I am particularly wary of Mr. Berg’s multiple fund-raising appeals and his dogged insistence that he is pursuing the correct path when may legal experts disagree with his tactics.

    Second, I perhaps erred by moving forward without first getting the actual evidence from Mr. Berg or others. I assumed that since time was tight and the statements made here were so certain, that it wouldn’t be difficult to obtain the evidence people spoke of. However, my repeated requests either went unanswered, or got me referrals to other web sites. Never did I get any admissible, first-hand evidence given to me.

    Finally, I will re-iterate what I said earlier. We are all Americans no matter what happens. We should act with honor and patriotism, accept the decisions of our civil authorities, and pursue this within the constitutional structure we have erected for ourselves.

    Given the nature of the court’s ruling, we are not going to appeal. We believe the court has it correct – the proper place to bring this is in Congress. That is what we will do.”"

  6. Anonymous says:

    Anonymous said…
    I have been silently following this since the beginning. Have one question. IF Big O was NOT born in Kenya, WHY would it be necessary to seal BIRTH RECORDS in Kenya? They simply would NOT exist. No?

    November 3, 2008 1:55 PM

    ____________________________

    Good point. If not born in Kenya, should be NO records to even seal, eh?

  7. Anonymous says:

    I hope that this gets resolved one way or another. Now that Obama is president, I want to be absolutely sure that he had a constitutional right to be a candidate for this office.

    Kenya’s newspapers have exploded celebrating the win of their SON in this election. Obama’s african grandmother says that now that the election is over she will agree to be interviewed…

    READ the Kenya’s newspapers. They are eye-opening…

  8. Anonymous says:

    if i may… reading through some British Broadcasting material some time ago i am led to believe many here are confusing obama’s grandmother(s).

    the woman whose picture appears outside the hut feeding chickens i believe her to be obama’s STEPMOTHER – one of his biological dad’s wives.

    the woman who lives in the tin corrugated hut is his paternal grandmother – his dad’s biological mother. THEY ARE TWO SEPARATE PEOPLE.

    there is also a wife of obama’s dad who resides in England.

    now i wish i had the clarification here t hand. i do now and i can only say some more research needs to be done here.

    i also allow that i could be the one that is wrong on this but i dont think so. i remember when i made the distinction i was intrigued how i at all times thought the women were one and the same. now i wish i had saved the article, but these two Kenyan women (paternal grandmother and stepmother) both live in Kenya, with another relative i believe to be another wife in England.

    the british reporter who took a translater with him spoke with the real grandmother and she is the one who says obama was born there. she is aldo the one obama avoids.

    obama traveled to Kenya and gave odinga a million dollars raised in the U.S. but didnt even stop by his grandmother’s house. she needs a tv but he didnt cough up a mere sixty or fivty bucks to get her one… the woman walks to a store to see his image on TV.

  9. Anonymous says:

    Ever since I saw Obama’s Indonesian school record, which says he is a Muslim
    ============
    with all due respect i think you overlooked that if his mother did this fraud it would say he was born in Hawaii. if she lied to the hawaiian Health Dept. they took her word for it.

    remember the only thing hawaii has is a “report of birth” and that is what is displayed on obama’s site. they issued a birth statement based on the mother, but no hospital, or midwife records exist. Further, a research team has determined no one by the name OBAMA WAS BORN in Hawaii during the month of August, 2961.

    Mom was a liar herself. she told obama lies about his dad. Remember?

  10. Anonymous says:

    postscript:

    about the confusion of real grandmother as opposed to stepmother. I believe the stepmother’s name is Sarah, but the the grandmother’s name excapes me now.

    the relitive in England is something like Kizzie and the real grand mother’s name is very unusual but not Sarah.

  11. Anonymous says:

    Tom Tancredo from Colorado also strongly opposed the design of the 9-11 memorial in PA.

  12. Anonymous says:

    If the electors who vote in the electoral college for each state really wanted to see Obama’s birth certificate, or else… what could he do? Half the states are not legally bound to vote the popular winner, and the State of Washington only has a $1000 fine for failure to vote the winner of the state’s election. Nov 4th is technically just the beginning of the presidential election process.

    Roses

  13. Kevin says:

    I must agree that this is very fishy–affidavits signed by anonymous people. If the tape is a fraud, I hope Berg lands in jail.

    This thing reads like one of those Nigerian petroleum scams that you get in email.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] that  Berg did not file an audio recording of McRae’s call with the court. It first appeared Nov. 1, 2008 on the “America’s Right” website of Jeff Schreiber, who describes himself on his site as being “on the right side of the [...]

  2. [...] that  Berg did not file an audio recording of McRae’s call with the court. It first appeared Nov. 1, 2008 on the “America’s Right” website of Jeff Schreiber, who describes himself on his site as being “on the right side of the [...]

Speak Your Mind

*