UPDATE — Michelle Obama’s Purported Admissions, and Philip Berg’s Lawsuit Mentioned in The Washington Times

Yesterday evening, rumors began to swirl around the Internet that Michelle Obama had once again opened her mouth only to stick her foot in it.

The rumors all pointed to an article on a little-known Web site named African Press International which purports to have interviewed Mrs. Obama on the continued controversy surrounding her husband’s citizenship. In the interview, Mrs. Obama laments that “American white racists” are bringing up the issue, that “there is no law that will stop him from becoming the president,” and says that Barack “was born in Hawaii, yes, and that gives him all the right to be an American citizen even though he was adopted by a foreigner.”

Upon hearing about it last night, I dismissed, as fraudulent, the article for several reasons and STILL very much believe that, standing alone, it fails to pass the sniff test. The timing is all wrong, the venue too obscure, the statements too venomous. Still, I learned this morning that the editors may have proof that the statements purported to come from the would-be First Lady are, in fact, authentic.

Honestly, it reminds me of the 1992 presidential campaign when supporters of President George Herbert Walker Bush claimed to have a photograph of Bill Clinton burning an American flag in a Moscow square, yet the photo never seemed to turn up. Here, the story itself reeks of fraud, but the addition of audiotape evidence would instead make it smell like roses.

Please continue checking here as things progress throughout the day. The updates begin at 10:30 a.m. Wednesday at the bottom of this entry, and work their way to the top. There is also new information on mainstream media attention for Philip Berg’s federal lawsuit against Barack Obama questioning his constitutional eligibility for the presidency.

Further background information on the Philip Berg suit–a story first broken here at America’s Right on August 21, 2008–can be found on the right-hand side of the page under the “BERG v. OBAMA @ AMERICA’S RIGHT” header.

– Jeff

October 16, 6:00pm

African Press International has again written and expressed their intent to release the audio recordings after weighing legal consequences of doing so. Once they do so–if they do so–we’ll absolutely cover it here.

They’ve also explained, rather nicely and fairly believably, the reason that Michelle Obama purportedly called them in the first place, chalking it up to contacts in Nairobi:

Many have question why Mrs Obama would choose a little known online media group instead of the American media. API was chosen because of a Nairobi contact that did not like the way API was covering Barack Obama using information collected from American media outlets. The Nairobi contact prevailed upon Mrs Obama to talk to API.

You know my feeling on this. It didn’t seem right to me from the beginning. If it’s authentic, though, if they do in fact have such evidence, I’ll gladly eat my words. Until then, however, I’m washing my hands of it.


A new entry at the African Press International Web site admonishes me for publishing the e-mail exchange between editor-in-chief Korir and WorldNetDaily’s Jerome Corsi. Let me be perfectly clear here:

I had express authorization from Jerome Corsi to make public the e-mail exchange in question.

“They know I’m a writer. They know what I do for a living,” Corsi said. “Anybody who corresponds with me in that capacity and does not specify that their correspondence is off-the-record knows that it is on-the-record. Their e-mail did not contain any such language, and it was treated accordingly.”

Please understand that I am not out to mince words, fabricate facts, or slander anybody. In fact, even last night I questioned whether or not the initial article at African Press International was indeed a complete fraud, and therefore an example of African Press International’s decision to knowingly publish inaccurate information about, and fabricated statements falsely associated with, Michelle Obama. If anyone should be looking over their shoulder for a libel suit, it’s the folks at African Press International.

That is, unless they can provide evidence of the conversation which had purportedly taken place between their staff and the wife of a major–the major–American presidential candidate.

In the recent article, the editorial staff at African Press International maintains that they are indeed in possession of an audio recording, that it will “be released when we are satisfied it is not intended to be misused in any way or for any gains by an group,” and that the Barack Obama campaign should not be so quick to denounce the statements made by API as patently false.

“They should wait until they get all the facts on the table before making any conclussions [sic],” the article reads. “They should not think they control all calls Mrs. Obama makes.”

With this recent non-admission, I’m resigned to say that I was correct to begin with. This whole thing smelled like a complete fraud. While it may have succeeded in drawing more attention to the questions surrounding the Illinois senator and to Philip Berg’s lawsuit in particular, we should wash our hands of this matter unless audiotape or certified telephone log evidence is released.

As one of the readers here at America’s Right wrote, perfectly, to me in an e-mail: “It sounds like someone is trying to get me to buy a car and ship it to their second cousin in Nigeria.”

Agreed. I couldn’t have said it better myself.

Corsi also agrees that, sans audiotape, the article at African Press International is not credible, stating that as far as he is concerned, until an audiotape or similar evidence is produced verifying the statements as Michelle Obama’s, the story is just that — a story.

“They write that they don’t want to release the tape for fear they will influence the election doesn’t add up,” Corsi said. “If that is the case, why’d they write the story in the first place?”


Another intervening motion was filed today in the ongoing federal suit against Barack Obama. This motion, filed pro se by “U.S. Citizen and voter” Judson Witham of Provo, Utah, is the third such motion for leave to intervene filed in this case. As I mentioned when the others were filed, I feel as though we should continue to focus our attention on the case-in-chief.

Counting this and the other two intervening motions, there are now nine pending motions in the Berg v. Obama action. The others include Berg’s motion for expedited discovery, Obama and the DNC’s motion to dismiss, Berg’s opposition to the motion to dismiss, Berg’s motion for leave to file amended complaint, Obama and the DNC’s motion for protective order, and Berg’s response to the motion for protective order.

Just a reminder — despite the perceived delay, the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick is well within his discretion here, and may very likely hand down an order (possibly addressing all pending pleadings) this week. Or he may not. Please continue to check America’s Right for updates.


The source I could not name earlier is in fact Jerome Corsi, author of the bestselling book, The Obama Nation. Corsi, of course, was the journalist detained in and deported from Kenya just a short week ago, shortly before he was to conduct a press conference further detailing among other things the relationship between Barack Obama and Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga.

Since hearing about the article released yesterday by African Press International, Corsi has been attempting to gain access to or even further information about materials which could verify the authenticity of the statements purported to come from Michelle Obama and subsequently denied by the Obama campaign.

“Given the e-mails I’m getting from the chief editor, he’s defending himself and I’m challenging him to produce the recording he says that he has,” Corsi said. “I don’t see any motive for him to lie. Still, I’m not accepting it as authentic without further investigation.”

Corsi went on to say that, “given the way he is defending it,” the report seems to be initially credible, and that “right now, my journalistic instincts say ‘okay, you’ve got my attention, and if you’re prepared to say it’s reliable, then prove it.’”

“I’m seriously interested, of course, but I need verification,” Corsi said. “I’m not buying this as a sure thing without verification.”

Corsi provided me with his e-mail exchange with the editors at African Press International as of 1:30 p.m. on Wednesday. This exchange, he said, will “validate that we’re in touch, and that they’re certainly under pressure to come forward.”

(NOTE: The times are off, most likely because of the time difference and other factors.)

From: Jerome Corsi
To: [Address Blocked]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:27 PM
Subject: J.Corsi on Michelle Obama story


I am the person who called you about your Michelle Obama article today. You refer to me in the article — We are getting inundated by our readers to know if the story is true. Did you record Michelle Obama and can you release to me the audio tape.

This is very important. Please get back to me immediately.

Jerome R. Corsi
Senior Staff Reporter
World Net Daily
[Number Blocked]


From: African Press International (API)
Subject: Re: J.Corsi on Michelle Obama story
To: [Address Blocked]
Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2008, 11:53 AM

I want to thank you for your email.

API hereby confirms to you that the story is true and if the huge interest on this particular story continues, we will post the recording on our website in the next immediate days.

When we published the story we did not intend to cause any chaos but we are shocked by the huge interest the story is receiving from the Americans and the American Media.

Mrs Obama called us just to ask API to stop joining the mainstream hate online media that is trying to destroy her husband’s opportunity to get the presidency.

Our editorial will sit today and agree on how to release the information that will verify the story.

Very many media outlets are asking us to email them the recording but we think the best way to satisfy all at once is by publishing it on our website and people can retrieve it themselves.

We understand the urgency this may have but it is important for us that we do it right so that we do not land into problems with Obama’s just like you did while in Kenyan recently.

Yours Sincerely,

Chief Editor Korikr


From: Jerome Corsi
To: African Press International (API)
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: J.Corsi on Michelle Obama story

If you have a recording of Michelle Obama it is imperative you make it available now. We at World Net Daily are getting inundated with requests to prove your story is true.

Jerry Corsi
World Net Daily
[number blocked]


From: African Press International (API)
Subject: Re: J.Corsi on Michelle Obama story
To: [Address Blocked]
Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2008, 12:57 PM

To Jerome Corsi,

We do not want to be misunderstood. We are not out to stop Obama from capturing the presidency.

We are not here to prove to people the story, but we will give proper verification so that people will understand that the story is true.

Soon, when we come with more information on the site, those who doubt the story will be surprised why Mrs Obama would choose to talk to us and not other media outlets.

We will bring out information on how she was connected to us, how she was convinced her story was safe with us and why she trusted API. And who introduced her to those who contacted API first before she personally took contact in an effort to ensure that API does not publish things on her husband that may be seen to be harmfull.

If we start dishing out audio to media outlets, we will be misunderstood. We do not want people to think that we published the story in order to spoil Obama’s chances to become the president.

Those who are contacting you demanding that the story should be verified now, should be directed by your media to check our website in the next day or two. All the information will be made available, but we must do it carefully.


Chief Editor Korir


From: Jerome Corsi

Subject: Re: J.Corsi on Michelle Obama story

To: “African Press International (API)”
Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2008, 1:24 PM

Chief Editor Korir,

I understand your position. You should be aware that the reaction of my publishers and what I am getting from various news editors contacting me is that this may be a hoax. Your credibility and the credibility of your story will be increasingly in question the longer you postpone making a tape available. Right now, the Obama campaign is telling us that you are lying and that Michelle Obama never made any such call to you.

I convey this to you as a fellow journalist prepared to believe that what you published is true. Now that it has been called into question, please do not hesitate to prove your authenticity and the truthfulness of what you published.

Jerome R. Corsi
World Net Daily
[Number Blocked]


From: Jerome Corsi
Subject: Re: J.Corsi on Michelle Obama story
To: “African Press International (API)”

Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2008, 1:44 PM

Mr. Korir,

This is what is running on National Review Online right now. The Obama campaign is denying your report and in the USA your API is being disregarded as untruthful:

National Review OnLine
Wednesday, October 15, 2008

That Michelle Obama Report [Byron York]

I’m sure a lot of you have seen references this morning to statements allegedly made by Michelle Obama in an interview with an organization called African Press International. I just asked the Obama campaign whether Michelle Obama did in fact speak to that organization, and spokesman Tommy Vietor answered:

The answer is no, it’s not real, the report is made up. She did not speak to the organization.

Check it out here: http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWM2MDA2NzZkNzdjNWMzZGFlOGJiZGUxMzNhYjJkZDI

I encourage you to come forward with proof as soon as possible, including any Michelle Obama tape recording you may have. Otherwise, your report and your publication will soon be considered “discredited” in the USA by the Obama camp response.


Jerome R. Corsi

World Net Daily

According to Jerome Corsi, that is the extent of the e-mail exchange so far. So far, he says, he is cautiously optimistic, and wants to ensure that pressure remains on the editors at African Press International to verify their claims and Michelle Obama’s statements.

“If they have a tape and they release it, this will be extremely damaging to the Obama campaign,” Corsi said. “If they don’t, there’s just another indication that there’s smoke but no fire. We’ll just have to wait and see. I am not prepared to go out on a limb and believe them, not unless they produce the audiotape they claim to have. If they don’t accept this challenge, I’m prepared to drop them.”

Corsi went on to point out that he had raised questions about whether or not Barack Obama was adopted by Indonesian stepfather Lolo Soetoro, saying that he wrote about the Indonesian school registration documents in The Obama Nation, and that “the Associated Press verified the photostats of those documents and certified them as true.” Because Obama is listed on those documents as an Indonesian citizen, Corsi says, it makes sense that Michelle Obama would tell African Press International that he was adopted.

“The truth is, we’re 20 days away from Election Day and even such a fundamental fact about where Barack Obama was born remains in doubt, and his campaign has done nothing about it,” Corsi said. “This problem should not require a Harvard Law degree to solve. This matter should not require an FBI investigation to sort out. We’ve got a man running for president who is conducting one of the most monumental cover-ups about, of all things, his own identity.”



Frank Gaffney at The Washington Times made reference to Philip Berg’s lawsuit against Barack Obama in yesterday’s paper, apparently, stating the following in an article entitled “The Jihadist Vote”:

Another question yet to be resolved is whether Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States, a prerequisite pursuant to the U.S. Constitution. There is evidence Mr. Obama was born in Kenya rather than, as he claims, Hawaii. There is also a registration document for a school in Indonesia where the would-be president studied for four years, on which he was identified not only as a Muslim but as an Indonesian. If correct, the latter could give rise to another potential problem with respect to his eligibility to be president.

Curiously, Mr. Obama has, to date, failed to provide an authentic birth certificate which could clear up the matter.

Philip Berg, just last evening, mentioned that he had completed a lengthy interview with a reporter from The Washington Times who had not yet heard of the federal suit and was “extremely intrigued by the whole thing.” Upon hearing about this story, however, Berg mentioned that the reporter he spoke with was not Frank Gaffney — so perhaps there is more to come.

Furthermore, it seems as though people from CNN’s D.C. bureau have been sniffing around at the federal courthouse here in Philadelphia. No details are available at this time.


Now, here’s the deal. I still think that the African Press International story, as it stands, is a complete fraud. However, the addition of a telephone number to be used for verification purposes–there was no answer at the other end–definitely piqued my interest and motivated me to make a few telephone calls.

My source–who, at this point, cannot be named–said that while he did not hear the audiotape himself, he knew for certain that they were in possession of it. This, of course, reminds me of back in 1992 when supporters of then President George Herbert Walker Bush said that they were in possession of a photograph of Bill Clinton burning an American flag in a Moscow square, only no such photograph ever turned up.

Again, we need to be careful here. On its face, the African Press International piece is about as suspect as it could be. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever that Michelle Obama would call this fly-by-night organization, which hadn’t been kind to her husband, and make such outrageously incriminating and otherwise divisive statements so close to the election. She may be an angry woman, but she’s also an intelligent one and should know the ramifications of saying such things.

This story has obviously taken off, so much so that it has been noted on two separate well-respected political blogs.

Byron York at National Review mentioned the rumors at The Corner, but oddly enough almost went out of his way not to mention anything about citizenship:

That Michelle Obama Report [Byron York]

I’m sure a lot of you have seen references this morning to statements allegedly made by Michelle Obama in an interview with an organization called African Press International. I just asked the Obama campaign whether Michelle Obama did in fact speak to that organization, and spokesman Tommy Vietor answered:

The answer is no, it’s not real, the report is made up. She did not speak to the organization.

ABCNews’ Jake Tapper was a little more specific on his Internet blog, Political Punch. Tapper went on to say that representatives of the Obama campaign dismissed the report as “all a lie,” and that he found their response “quite believable”:



  1. Anonymous says:

    Jeff, what do you mean when you say “There is also new information on mainstream media attention for Philip Berg’s federal lawsuit against Barack Obama questioning his constitutional eligibility for the presidency”

    Has an MSM outlet picked up the story?

  2. Anonymous says:

    Everyday this election takes new twists and turns. I feel like I’m living inside a mystery novel where the slimiest character is Barack Obama.

    Really, this would make a very good movie.

  3. Jeff Schreiber says:


    The Washington Times printed a little something and CNN has been poking around — I mentioned it in this update.


  4. Anonymous says:

    Thanks, Jeff. You’ve navigated in a fair and masterful way. Unbelievable how much voltage runs through this. You will make a fine lawyer someday.

    My personal guess is they have the tape. Life is odd this way. Time will tell what happens. No telling what comes next.

    Please don’t let the ambiguity throw you off stride.

  5. Me says:
  6. Anonymous says:

    Jeff, If and when this case is in court, will the public be allowed to go? I live 45 minutes away and would love to take a trip down there and see this.

  7. Jon says:

    This is someone trying to bury the truth under a mountain of B.S.

    The more we rant about it, the more likely “we” will be cross referenced as “believers of” this B.S. Thus the truth (and Bergs lawsuit) will be discredited by any serious investigators.

    They keep Mrs. O sequestered 99% of the time. How many times has she been out since the “proud of my country” comments? I can count them on 1 hand. So what in the world makes anyone think she said something so stupid to some pissa## little site run by English speaking Africans in Norway?

    Berg’s lawsuit has merit, IMO this “Angry call to random reporter Negros in Norway” story has none.

  8. ComOB says:


    You and Mr. Korir have absolutely no basis to attack Jeff. API made the decision to run the story, and now Mr. Korir needs to have the journalistic integrity to ‘promptly’ substantiate his claims. The burden of Mr. Korir’s actions are his own to bare, not the global media at large. As it has been pointed out, there is no logic behind running the story if Mr. Korir did not have the intention to provide the audio recording immediately and without condition.

    Therefore, the only individual that is being an ass at the moment is API. Their hesitance and comments are, at best, suspect.

  9. clwmba09 says:


    This blog has answered many questions i have had since hearing this story three days ago. Thanks for your hard work. Don’t you think the focus on API and their validation is too much? What I care about is the ruling that demanded Obama turn over records on Oct 15. What has happened there? Isn’t that where the weight lies to expose this guy?

  10. Phil says:

    We have yet another update from the “API” site, where they yet again stand behind their story, their audio feed, and whatever else of which they purport to have possession:

    The Michelle Obama story sparks outcry in the US – The Americans demand that API makes public the Audio recording

    I’m still trying to make some heads or tails of this…

    Nobody outside of these folks at “API” can verify the story as legitimate, because we have an undocumented interview and that’s it.

    It’s almost as if they’re trying to gin up support for their website by getting their page hit counter to peg as high as possible before releasing any further info.

    It’s also interesting that the above article makes things sound like they are their own entity, unbound by the wishes of anyone except themselves. That is, however, a bit hard to believe, what with their attitude of, “It’s simply amazing that our little interview here has produced so much controversy with those Americans!”

    And for those folks who have an issue with Jeff releasing Jerome’s emails, two observations:

    1. Unless the contents of the emails were edited (and we readers have no way to determine this), there are no explicitly stated claims of confidentiality; further, Jerome and Jeff have both proceeded forward expressly stating that such public release was not a problem.

    2. There is nothing materially different between what the emails say versus what all other published articles/commentary say; if anything, they do show that “API” is maintaining their story through and through.

    Let’s watch and see exactly when the audio/additional information is actually released, if ever. That could say a lot.


  11. Anonymous says:

    Stop the Obama Constitutional Crisis
    Sign the Petition : 11,066 Letters and Emails Sent So Far
    A lawsuit has been filed with the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court requiring Mr. Obama to produce documents to prove he is constitutionally qualified to run for President. So far Mr. Obama has refused to produce the documents and is trying to fight the court order to produce the documents. Any American should be able to prove citizenship in less than a day. Why can’t Mr. Obama?

    Here is a link to the actual court documents – http://news.justia.com/cases/featured/Pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/
    A constitutional crisis will rip our country apart. If this is not cleared up now we will have a crisis. If you care at all about America you must call for Mr. Obama to produce the documents and prove that he is eligible to be President.

    Please call on Mr. Obama to produce the documents to prove his constitutional qualifications.

    Thank you

  12. Anonymous says:

    I seriously almost can’t take all this anymore. I know Obama is not what he appears to be. I know he associates with low-lifes. I know he cannot tell the truth to save his soul. However, waiting for the Judge to rule on Berg’s motions has caused me sleepless nights. I am in fear of what Obama is doing and will do to our country. I have been a Democrat my whole life and even I am questioning him. Something is not right! It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that out. I know the judge is trying to take his time, but crap or get off the pot already! You are causing a panic in America! Make a decision for “discovery” and you cannot be faulted for that. As my grandmother used to say, “better safe then sorry”. He either has the vault form or he does not. Let’s get this show on the road.

  13. Anonymous says:

    Obama is a liar and a deceptive guy and he might even get away with this dishonest behavior and trample the constitutional requirements to become PotUSA. After all, he is black and we know that black people in the USA are “legally entitled” (shamefully entitled I could say) to affirmative action 1) at work; 2) at school; 3) at universities (Obama got to Harvard without the get necessary to get a place at Harvard!!); 3) for the Democratic nomination of the PotUSA (a black does not need to pass the super delegates test and got the nomination autoamtically by affirmative action due to the color of his skin!!); and 4) probably also for the PotUSA!!

    Apart from that, you will never ever get the audio files of Michelle Obama!!
    Mind you, they might exist! But Corsi has been a little bit to explicit with the African Press International (API) (second time I believe; the first was with McCain saying that McCain would lose if he kept talking about the economy). It is a mistake to say to the African Press International (API) too explicitly why you want the tapes even though you are entitled to assume that they understand why even if they might not be fully clear about the very tricky issue related to the Indonesia adoption of Obama!!

    So, conclusion:
    —no answer by the judge until after the elections and he will tell that it is not his jurisdiction!
    —no tapes of the anti-American Michelle Obama even though she might have spoken to the African Press International (API)!!

    When are we going to get results, tangible results instead of false hopes!! After all, the elections start in a couple of days and ACORN has created so many bogus voters that this coming elections is very likely to be a fraud of the highest magnitude!!

    Having said that, let us keep hope and keep fighting for the truth to be revealed. Once it is for good, Obama can go back to Kenyan to support the Muslim thug who has been at the origin of ugly deeds against Christians in Kenya (deaths, burning of churches ,etc.!!!)

    Obama, the closet Muslim who cannot bear to put an American flag on his suit saying that it might peeve other people (his friends) who see the USA as an agent of evil!!!!!

    Obama, NObama!!

  14. Anonymous says:

    Blogger clwmba09 said “What I care about is the ruling that demanded Obama turn over records on Oct 15. What has happened there?”

    Well, clwmba09, you’re not alone in being confused about that “ruling.”

    Truth is that there hasn’t been a ruling. The document you’re viewing is a PROPOSED order and not an actual signed order.

    Most jurisdictions require that attorneys file a proposed order along with any motion or any request for the court to take any kind of action. It saves a lot of time for court staff.

    The proposed order is the attorney’s list of what he wants the judge to rule. Sort of written wishful thinking.

    Both sides will file proposed orders with their filings, usually along with a memorandum of law, or brief, explaining the legal reasoning on which they base their request to the court.

    Unless and until the judge actually signs an order, it is no more than a piece of paper.

    The only order that has been signed in the Berg v Obama case is the order denying Berg’s initial request for injunctive relief, which would have effectively shut down the campaign.

    No discovery orders have been signed. No one has been ordered to produce anything.

  15. Anonymous says:

    Anytime I hear about ” NIGERIA” I became sceptic. Maybe I’m wrong.I wish.The Nigerians were those who wanted to contribute to Obamas camp. They collected the money, but one of the London Bank,became suspicious and stopped the money before it reached the USA. I could be wrong, but I’m still suspicious about Nigeria.

  16. Anonymous says:

    It would not surprise me at
    all that API could have been
    “set-up”. Some slimey “impersonator” from the Obama Camp, (who sound’s
    like Michelle), could have easily called API and made the statement’s knowing that if API published them, they would be in a position
    for a Lawsuit. API would then be in their pocket.
    IF API does have a REAL
    Tape of Michelle they are
    probably looking for the Highest Bidder, (including Obama). I doubt API will turn it over for free.
    I believe that Federal
    Law allow’s “two-party” taped phoned
    conversation’s which are accross a State Line are
    subject to “one party” consent. As usual, we are in another situation of,
    “Only Time Will Tell”.
    After not having a “Drink”
    in 15 year’s I’m about ready
    to hit the Smirnoff for a
    Weekend! Cheer’s
    ….far-fetched, but ya never know……. Dan

  17. Anonymous says:

    Ladies & Gentlemen,

    CNN knows about Berg's lawsuit and simply "dismissed" it. Judge probably will wait until after elections. It leaves only one possibility to "win" this case – let know American people about its existence (they don't know because MSM don't inform about it), and they will decide this case during elections knowing this information and according their hearts.

    VIDEO "October Surprise" has at this moment more than 800,000 views. It has to be more than 80,000,000 to be effective. Please email a message (like below) to as many addresses as you can. And let's see.

    Subject: "October Surprise"

    Not eligible to be President of the US? Why???


    Watch VIDEO:

    Obama's Citizenship: I Invented The Internet (Ep. 6: October Surprise) 11min

    The same VIDEO can be seen here:

    October 11, 2008
    "This could be the game changer"
    or here

    Saturday, October 11, 2008
    "Philip Berg Interview Hits YouTube"

    It seems this matter is of interest for everybody.

    Please e-mail it to everyone you can think about.


  18. Phil says:

    OK, just saw the following comment from the posting, On Obama: I can’t live with the idea of an Islamic Radical Communist being commander in chief of the most powerful military in the world. Many are saying there will be another civil war in the US. (comment #5, purportedly the editor):

    …Next week we will bring an interview with a lady who was Obama’s lover in Scandinavia.

    I’m not sure if any of these types of stories have legs to them, but if you do a Google search on “Larry Sinclair,” you’ll find a guy who claims to have had multiple email accounts and blogs hijacked by the Obama campaign and claims to have had a couple of, shall we say, “trists” with the Senator.

    Things get more and more interestinger and interestinger.


  19. Anonymous says:

    Well, if Corsi can e-mail API, so can the Obama people–and they’re not as kind as Corsi. If she did the stupid thing–and she’s done them before–then Obama’s people were on API like flies on honey.
    And they had their big guns out, and didn’t just do a lot of begging and whining either…

  20. Anonymous says:
  21. Phil says:

    Thanks to whomever linked to Recordings and information leading to recent API story on Michelle Obama’s telephone call is now being cleared for release. I have a few observations:

    1. API’s story has not changed. They maintain they have the evidence and even venture to say that there are unpublished aspects that will “cause” the Obama contacts to essentially back off that this isn’t true.

    2. They continue perpetuating quite a tone of naivete, don’t you think? They continually assert that they are “surprised” by how much attention this story is getting. This makes me think that the whole birth cert concept was never a consideration on their part. That’s a hunch, but how else do you explain their apparent ignorance of drawing such a crowd to their site?

    Nevertheless, none of this is to say that they are in any way more legitimate with this story. In fact, they are building themselves up for even more of a big fall if all of this is a farce.

    On the other hand, while they may have not realized what they’ve gotten themselves into at this point, if they actually possess such evidence, they are correct in postulating that this will change America’s landscape forever.

    “May you live in interesting times.” — ancient proverb from somewhere


  22. Koyaan says:

    anonymous wrote:

    Looks like the tape may be soon released.

    Yeah. Someone’s probably still running around screaming:

    Adopted! I can’t find a recording of Michelle saying ‘adopted’! Whose bright idea was it to write the damn post before we made the tape? You think anyone would notice if we used ‘adapted’ instead?



  23. Anonymous says:

    Larry Sinclair conducted a national press conference June 18, 2008 outlining the nature of his contacts with Obama.

    He was immediately incarcerated following the presentation on bogus charges for 5 days. Involved were Senator Biden’s son, Attorney General for Delaware, and following Biden as V.P. pick the charges were dropped. Later they admitted the incarceration was installed to control publicity of the NPC.

    I only cite this as one more example of the multitude of cover-ups by the Obama campaign.
    Sinclair is now on his “taking it to the streets tour”, despite abuse of every type imaginable, in an effort to get his story out.

    Many know the story, but the MSM have done their dutiful part and have not reported.

    The pattern with all things associated with Obama’s narratives now bear a signature mark.

  24. Anonymous says:

    This whole thing souinds like the Georgia Bigfoot body hoax that ran a few weeks back. Basically if you have evidence, you produce it. If not, it’s a fraud.

  25. Anonymous says:

    Greg Stay says: Don’t bag on Bigfoot. He’s real. I’ve seen him. However, Michelle Obama’s “adopted” or “whitey” tapes are just hoaxes.

    To Jeff, Bigfoot says “Hi.”

  26. SluggoJD says:

    So here we are over a month later, and not one person noticed “Jim.”

    A lot of folks would love to blame this all on “Sammy Korir of API,” and just move on, since the hoax failed miserably.

    But the fact of the matter is, “Sammy Korir” wasn’t behind the hoax – Parker James Shannon, aka Beckwith of The Obama Files, was.

    And that’s why Corsi called “Jim,” and wrote his initial email to “Jim.”

Speak Your Mind